User talk:Stixxer

June 2017
Hello, I'm Dan D. Ric. An edit that you recently made to Charibert I seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dan D. Ric (talk) 16:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charibert I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan D. Ric (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charibert I, you may be blocked from editing. Dan D. Ric (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charibert I. Frood 16:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)