User talk:Stjudestucson

I have added a section on Anthony Clavier's sexual misconduct and his being deposed by the Anglican Church in America. All facts are verified by the references now indicated on the Tony Clavier page. I know the press articles to be true as the board of Saint Jude's on which I served hired an investigator who verified much of this information directly from the people involved. Stjudestucson (talk) 07:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Tony Clavier
Hi - please stop adding that content to the article, its poorly cited and contentious and as such has been disputed - there is another report at the BLP noticeboard here where you can make a case for inclusion and present WP:RS to support your desired addition - I have also left you a helpful list of our policies and guidelines ot assist you. thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Replacing policy violating content
Hi - you got my note - please stop re adding your policy violating content or I will ask for your editing privileges to be removed. Off2riorob (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Tony Clavier
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Tony Clavier. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Off2riorob (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Last warning
Please stop adding your policy violating content and join in the discussion - Off2riorob (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Responce:

I have removed the sections which only have paper documents to back them up. I will leave them down until I can find copies of them on the internet. I would say that claiming poor verification on my part is silly given the errors which appear in other text on the site Tony Clavier. I trust that the well referenced section currently on the page will not be removed so as not to hide a significant part of the story of Anthony Clavier.

Stjudestucson (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Churches cannot have accounts here, nor can any other collective entity
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you.

Additionally, it appears your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest, though you may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)