User talk:Stlwebs

Welcome
Hello, Stlwebs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

re: RAPTOR telescope image
I have no objection to the RAPTOR telescope per say. But you should read WP:IMAGES. The RAPTOR image had problems re: that guideline since it was redundant... the page didn't need another image of a telescope.... and it was a poor image.... it is so cropped in it is hard to see what is in the image. Just because something is notable does not mean it makes an encyclopedic image. Also you need to put some kind of image use tag on the image page or it will be deleted soon. If the RAPTOR telescope is important you should consider putting up an article on it. Be sure to reference 3rd party sources for those claims, see citing sources in the introduction above. 75.199.79.230 (talk) 23:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Raptor2 l600 lg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Raptor2 l600 lg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment etiquette
Hi, It is ok to leave comments on an article talk page but it is considered bad etiquette to edit someone else’s comments as you did here. If you want to add a comment please put it at the section bottom or at the page bottom as a new heading (have a look at my edit on the page to see where I moved your comment. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)