User talk:Stmarom/sandbox

What does the article (or section) do well? (Here, consider the contribution’s tone—is it neutral? Is it well sourced? Does it offer useful reference information?) '''- Very good! I honestly like the depth of information you've added. The tone is also satisfied and same with the requirements. I do enjoy the hyperlinks, however, I didn't see many citations as well? I do see a list at the bottom but be sure to add it in wherever necessary as a citation!'''

What changes would you suggest overall? (Be as specific as possible in your suggestions.) - Honestly, I think it's very solid, you have a ton of information, if you wanted you could add maybe a reference picture, but other than that, you've accomplished the task and the information is all there What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? - Again, just citations, but you're good to go otherwise! - BRIANNA CHEW

Peer Review

What does the article/section do well? I really like how you added a background section. It really helps paint a picture for why/how solar energy storage came about. The entire section is definitely neutral and offers an abundant amount of relevant information regarding the topic.

I have no idea why that was added inside a box and I don't know how to change it ^

What changes would you suggest overall? I think I would separate the previous storing methods that were explored in a separate section. It's a little confusing on what methods were used and what were abandoned?

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? The most important thing you can do is to add citations throughout the article because I don't think that I saw any? I know you used references because of the references list you added on the bottom, but you should still add in text citations throughout your writing as well.

Choi.kel (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)