User talk:Stoddski

Vuly Trampolines
Hello, I've speedy deleted this article again. If you have a conflict of interest about the subject, which almost certainly seems to be the case, you should not be going anywhere near that subject. Graham 87 03:34, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I disagree strongly with your deletion (as per my comment on your talk page). I believe the article shows notability enough to be a wikipedia article, and is written in an un-promotional manner. I find it objectionable that this page was deleted, and not pages like Springfree Trampolines. Is there a way we can rewrite the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoddski (talk • contribs) 12:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * No, not the level of media interest so far (newspapers local to Brisbane, mostly tabloid media) – all the coverage is far too parochial. Graham 87 13:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I would have thought that the Channel 10 feature (national news) and Weekend Australian three page article (national broadsheet) would count for more than parochial news! Even the Courier Mail is Queensland's only state-wide paper (verging on tabloid, but it counts for big news in Queensland!), which all the other references come from. Stoddski (talk) 04:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Springfree Trampoline and Vuly Trampolines
Springfree Trampoline is a company that has established a presence in a number of countries worldwide, not just its home market. The article could be improved and probably will when i get around to it but notability is not in doubt. To keep an article about Vuly Trampolines in Wikipedia, I suggest that you focus a bit on the facts as opposed to marketing, find independent articles which discuss the origins and how the new designs is an improvement over more conventional trampolines. Reprints of company press releases are not suitable. Dabbler (talk) 11:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * An additional suggestion would be to build the article in your sandbox (User:Stoddski/sandbox) where it will not be obvious to random viewers and then ask someone like me or User:Graham87}Graham87 to advise and comment on its acceptability before publishing.Dabbler (talk) 11:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)