User talk:Stone2ypr

Welcome ! 

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Ascii002, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your, a link to this talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. ou can  for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you  put  on.

 Sincerely, —  Ascii002    Let's talk!   Contribs   01:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ascii002&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Help me!
How long will it take for this message is removed from an article "This page is a new unreviewed article. This template should be removed once the page has been reviewed by someone other than its creator; if necessary the page should be appropriately tagged for cleanup. (July 2014)"

Thanks in advance.

Stone2ypr (talk) 01:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi: The message should have been removed in this edit 6 minutes after you placed this here, when someone tagged the article as needing cleanup. I see you have now removed all the tags. I'm going to do a bit of added cleanup on top of what you did, but I have to say that on first examination, the sourcing doesn't look very good. Are there any other articles about him from newspapers or magazines that you can add? They do not have to be online. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Image copyrights
Hi again Stone2ypr: I was glad to get a look at that Bronx News article (if only to confirm how it capitalized AIDS), but I've had to remove it from the article and to tag it and the pic of him with the other Progress for America award winner for deletion on Commons. Please read the applicable copyright rules. In a nutshell, unless you physically operated the camera to take the picture (not a scanner or a camera used to rephotograph a flat photo), if it doesn't have a tag on it saying it is copyright-free, you probably don't have the right to upload it to any Wikimedia project. Wikipedia has a very limited exception for copyrighted images that are the subject of discussion in an article - known as "fair use" - but in that case the image can only be used in one article, and the upload rationale must spell out where it will be used and why it is necessary. This is not allowed, for example, for pictures of living people, since it will be possible to get a new, copyright-free image of a living person at a convention or other public event. Commons is totally strict - no fair use. The newspaper image fails the free use criteria and in any case, yuo uploaded it at Commons. The award image is simply taken from the America for Progress web page - if you were actually the photographer there, it would be allowed, but since it has been previously published, you would have to send an e-mail to Comons OTRS explicitly stating that and giving up all rights to control future use of the image. See the welcome message on your Commons user talk page. Note that Wikimedia projects have a stricter standard than US law with respect to copyright, because the mission of the projects - especially of Commons - is to provide material that any reader can reuse in any way, including republication for profit. I haven't touched the first image, the one in the infobox, but if you got that off the internet, you need to replace it with a free image, since he is a living person. Sorry about this, but copyright violation is a serious legal matter. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Yngvadottir I appreciate your helpful insights and all you've done with helping getting things straight, I totally understand and will continue to learn the wiki world. Thanks for taking it down.--Stone2ypr (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Devin Gibson


The article Devin Gibson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Poorly sourced promotional article fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:ARTIST, WP:BAND, etc

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

I appreciate the concern, after looking over the article once more and revisions from other wiki contributors, I found no promotional material and all statements to be properly cited thank you--Stone2ypr (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Stone2ypr. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Devin Gibson, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. See also re undisclosed paid editing Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Devin Gibson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devin Gibson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Devin Gibson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

with respect to edit at my talk page
It's just possible you didn't follow the links in that conversation and thought it was about you. It wasn't. Now I am afraid I must go to bed; but chin up, find what sources you can, remember what I told you about general notability as opposed to notability for an artist. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Indeed thanks so much again for everything, it's my first article so can't really take it personal have a good night --Stone2ypr (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)