User talk:Stonu2003

September 2021
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of data-erasing software. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Will keep in mind! Stonu2003 (talk) 06:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Stonu2003 (talk)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of data-erasing software, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 07:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You seem to act on impulse and my assertions will be spelt out in the next few lines. Give me a credible point as to how I am disrupting and how my insertion was advertorial. All the lists in the page of List of data-erasing software have followed the same notability and structure that I did (most inclusions in the list have external links to their website and i dont know how it harms wikipedia's main concern. It simply takes user to know what the software. If it is so delete every inclusion that has external link. You are not God so please give credible explanation and I am at all my right to raise red flag against you. Stonu2003 (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The article List of data-erasing software contains a list of notable companies, ie. those with Wikipedia articles, it is not an indiscriminate list of ALL data erasing software and logging out to continue edit warring is likely to lead to a block. Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You mean to say to have wiki article is the only way to be notable, instead of simply rejecting, being in denial and giving admonition and warning, the better way could be let me know the way out. DONT MAKE IT AN EGO ISSUE, it serves neither u, neither readers, wiki or me. Stonu2003 (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You mean to say to have wiki article is the only way to be notable, instead of simply rejecting, being in denial and giving admobishion and warning, the better way could be let me know the way out. DONT MAKE IT AN EGO ISSUE, it serves neither u, neither readers, wiki or me. Stonu2003 (talk) 09:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Reinsertion with removal of external link
Please be informed the same has been reinstated with adherence to Wikipedia guidelines and reviewer comment

Not always things are intentional. It was just following a template and style of earlier listing (Blancco). Apropos to your comment the same has been reinserted by removing the external link and following all parameters the other listing have done. Hope you wont delete this anymore.

Stonu2003 (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Thank you so much. Am really glad that finally, you have shown me the way. I have studied deeply and am really well informed and aware about my mistake. Although I might make some and learn in the process. Thanks

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Stonu2003. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page List of data-erasing software, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Shujakhan88&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Shujakhan88. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)