User talk:StopEditorAbuse

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:StopEditorAbuse/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:StopEditorAbuse/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:StopEditorAbuse/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks D.G. for the feedback. I would improve the article and find more reliable sources to expand on the matter, however the sandbox has been deleted. Seems Wikipedia is not a very supportive environment after all... Or some topics want to be kept in the dark... StopEditorAbuse (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:StopEditorAbuse/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:StopEditorAbuse/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an "attack page" or an unsourced biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity, or articles about living people that are entirely negative and unsourced. Attack pages, attack files and negative unreferenced BLPs are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 11:35, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Kylie,
 * I hope you are fan-Tastic today. You deleted my sandbox based on two reasons. G5 - I am not SkyKingRSA, I do know him. We are not the same user. Did you properly investigate that before making that assumption?
 * G10 - If you have a problem with my article then why not give feedback or advise. Its a work in progress. I am always open to feedback and to learning. To simple delete something that you do not agree with is the exact definition of what my post was describing. After I heard what happened to SkyKingRSA I looked into the topic and found and amazing amount of people disparaged from using or contributing to Wikipedia because of "WikiNazi's". Thus the reason for creating a page for a term broadly used that is not found anywhere on Wikipedia.
 * Look forward to hearing from you.
 * S.E.A. StopEditorAbuse (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Someone else will review this, but you absolutely are a meat puppet. You took up SkyKing's cause. And random complainants online are not independent reliable sources with a history of fact checking and editorial control. 331dot (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Enough. TPA revoked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)