User talk:Stopford2014

Your submission at AfC Tom Chapman was accepted
 Tom Chapman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

File permission problem with File:Profile image of Tom Chapman, musician.png
Thanks for uploading File:Profile image of Tom Chapman, musician.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

The Friends of Didsbury Park moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to The Friends of Didsbury Park. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and none of the references are significant coverage from reliable sources and at least one is not independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 23:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * hey there, I'm trying to update the wiki page for The Friends of Didsbury Park, but I'm hitting a few problems and it's late in the uk. first, I'm going to add a reference to our registration page on the UK Charity Commission website - which clarifies we are a legitimate charity that was established to maintain the park https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-search/-/charity-details/5124318/governing-document
 * Second, tomorrow morning the Friends of Didsbury Park will be awarded a prestigious award for volunteering groups, from the UK's King, King Charles. We are embargoed from announcing this until 9am (Uk) tomorrow morning (on risk of having the award removed if this is leaked), but this will give us another very legitimate reference to cite and I will add the references once this is all announced. Hope this helps, we're only a small charity and we're hoping to make the most of this huge news. Stopford2014(talk) 23:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[ reply]

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Stopford2014. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:The Friends of Didsbury Park, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 23:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Friends of Didsbury Park (November 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Friends of Didsbury Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Friends_of_Didsbury_Park Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Friends_of_Didsbury_Park reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Friends of Didsbury Park
Hello, Stopford2014. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Friends of Didsbury Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)