User talk:Stopg0

Welcome!

Hello, Stopg0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Scenic Wealth Management, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Travelbird (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Scenic Wealth Management


A tag has been placed on Scenic Wealth Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Scenic Wealth Management
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Scenic Wealth Management, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

October 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Titus Young, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 22:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Germany Schulz
You have made unsourced changes to the Germany Schulz article. Your last edit summary (here) states "sorry to burst your bubble", but bursting bubbles has nothing to do with the matter. The National Football Foundation states ([ here]) in its official biography of Schulz: "He was responsible for two innovations at his position. Before Schulz, centers always sent the ball end-over-end. He invented a spiral snap. Before Schulz, centers always played in the line on defense. He dropped back, became a roving center and football's first linebacker." You have inserted text stating that Bachman was responsible for the roving center innovation, but you have provided no sourcing for your change. Without sourcing, your change (which is contradicted by the National Football Foundation) cannot stand. Please do not insert these changes again unless you also provide reliable sourcing for your change. Your continuing to insert unsourced information can result in your being blocked. Cbl62 (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * FYI Here is one source, though not the best. He is indeed older than Schulz. There are others with similar disputes such as Percy Given. However, histories repeatedly give the title to Schulz. Innovations of this type often have multiple threads; but descendants refer to the Master as if we were Pythagoreans. I am curious who gets the credit between the era of the snap with your foot and the end-over-end snap. Pa Corbin describes the former. Cake (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand that there are often multiple threads, but biographical profiles written by a university's web site are notoriously unreliable sources for claims of this type. In this case, the National Football Foundation and other highly reliable sources credit Schulz.  The point with Stopgo is that he continues to insert wholly unsourced claims into the Schulz article.  I will endeavor to clear it up in a bit. Cbl62 (talk) 16:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I trust you do; it was my attempt to address the both of you. Schulz is to linebacking what Bradbury Robinson is to passing, if you like. I tried to account for the various linebacking threads you find on the NFF's own hall of fame site in the history section of the linebacker article, but for that reason I did not remove the picture of Schulz, or change much of what was said of him already. Indeed, I noted the source on Bachman as shaky, but figured it is the origin of this dispute. For my own studies, I can find you some references to "backing up the line" before Schulz (e. g. Red Smith), which has me wonder if such was also once a way to refer to the secondary. Note despite Givens and Smith, Frank Juhan is credited with playing linebacker first in the south in a similar fashion as Schulz is for the nation. Cake (talk) 19:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Cake. I am familiar also with Bradbury Robinson's claims, and that is a can of worms.  In any event, I think your treatment of the Linebacker issue is nuanced and appropriate. Cbl62 (talk) 16:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Caballero1967. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Germany Schulz has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Caballero / / Historiador   ☊  14:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)