User talk:Storizenmagazine

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storizen Magazine (August 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Z0 were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Storizenmagazine/sandbox/Storizen Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Storizenmagazine/sandbox/Storizen Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Storizenmagazine/sandbox/Storizen_Magazine Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Z0&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Storizenmagazine/sandbox/Storizen_Magazine reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The editor  whose username is Z0 14:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲 水 15:08, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Request
You have a blatant conflict of interest in those subject areas. Are you sure you read WP:COI?!? --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock-spamun|saurabh-chawla|I am not writing about my family, friends, clients etc. in any way. What I will be working on would be publically accessible, verifiable and known sources and I will definitely double-check everything before doing any changes or publishing anything. If by blatant conflict of interest you mean that I am not allowed to write on these subjects, I will be writing on topics other than these topics with a neutral point of view and make sure that there is no conflict of interest.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=saurabh-chawla | reason=Ah! Thank you for your response 331dot. I will then be writing on topics related to health and overall wellness. I hope that will not be a cause of concern. | decline=Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)}}

Thank you Yamla
Thank you Yamla for sharing the answer. I’m anyways not interested anymore. Thank you for your help and all the best. Storizen Magazine (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)