User talk:Storm013

Welcome!
Hello, Storm013, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- John of Reading (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Portal:Peter Godwin
At Wikipedia, "Portals" are introductions to broad topic areas - have a look at, say, Portal:Technology, Portal:Africa or Portal:Jane Austen. The page you created, Portal:Peter Godwin, isn't a suitable topic for a portal, so I have tagged it for deletion. To write an article about this person, I suggest you work in your "sandbox" page, User:Storm013/PETER GODWIN. However, before going any further with it, please read the Wikipedia "notability" guide for biographies or the handy summary at WP:42. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi. In regards to [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quiddity&diff=568530443&oldid=568248012 the message] you left on my talkpage:
 * Please note that I'm not an administrator, and I did not delete the Portal:Peter Godwin page; I merely removed the redlink that led to it, at Portal:Contents/Portals/Culture and the arts. Sorry that you're having a bad day, but please do read what John linked to, above - particularly the WP:42 page, which is quite brief and clear. Thanks. –Quiddity (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Portal:Peter Godwin (August 15)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tazerdadog (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Good Advice
This is very important to understand. Your comment elsewhere implies a fellow editor is intentionally trying to harm you. It displays a complete misunderstanding of our mutual roles here at Wikipedia. 'Editor Quiddity is not your adversary. He is your fellow editor, fellow collaborator, fellow teacher. He has ONLY the best intentions for the article. That you can be sure of. To continually imply otherwise shows you really don't yet understand the role of your fellow editors. Most times new editors are concerned only with the article (or Portal) they have just created. But, experienced editors like User:Quiddity are more concerned with the Encyclopedia as a whole. I know you are a new user and you hold this article/portal and your edits to it and your word choices and your particular references as precious and you can't bear to see them changed. You have great pride in your work and rightfully so. But saving it in its original form has become a mission. Because you have misunderstood some basic facts, you see experienced editors like Quiditty as having a "cruel hands". That could not be further from the truth. Once you change your opinion of him and what he is doing you will be on the path to a happier Wikipedia career. Nothing here is stable; everything is in a constant state of change. How you accept that fact is always up to you. ```Buster Seven   Talk  06:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Portal:Peter Godwin concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Portal:Peter Godwin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Portal:Peter Godwin


Hello Storm013. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Portal:Peter Godwin".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)