User talk:Stormbrewing

Conflict of interest and your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Stormbrewing", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chris Cox (magician), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:31, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Stormbrewing, a review posted on a website like this is not a reliable source. In fact, this sort of a source is directly called out and not permitted by BLPSPS. If you were to find an article on the New York Times or Chicago Tribune that asserted this, then you would have something. A review by a person with the pseudonym "Sssssssddwe" is no better than me saying this performer is unethical. It's not verifiable. I strongly, in the most adamant terms, urge you to stop adding this material to this article until you find such a source. I would also encourage you to run the source by me or ask at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. We have a policy here called Biographies of living persons. It's critical that it is adhered to. Do not re-add this material without a strong, reliable, secondary source to support it. I understand you're new, and do not understand fully what are and are not acceptable sources. That's ok. Really. We all started somewhere. However, continuing to add this negative material without a proper source is not acceptable in any respect and could lead to you being blocked here. I'm happy to help you, but pushing forward with this without consulting with me or that noticeboard is likely to be problematic. Please. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)