User talk:Storypath1100xx

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Atlantic Ocean, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Atlantic Ocean was changed by Storypath1100xx (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870564 on 2011-03-20T12:41:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Calculator, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Naheed Nenshi. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Shylock. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Webber Academy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Webber Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Webber Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I'm completing this nomination on good faith for another editor. Please see additional details at the AfD link above. czar  &middot;   &middot;  06:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)