User talk:Stotheh

Southern 313s
Hi, I wasn't doubting your sincerity by reverting your edits earlier. I was just going by what Rail magazine listed (fifteen to Southern, eight to FCC) but evidently it has got it wrong. Sorry for any offence.

Do you have any idea whether Southern plan to obtain some 508s to work alongside the 313s? I heard they were looking at taking some of them on due to a dispute between Merseyrail and Angel Trains. Cheers! L1v3rp00l (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Class_313_Southern_Diagram.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Class_313_Southern_Diagram.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Class 313
Thanks for your post on my talk page. Unfortunately, it means that your 'inside' information cannot be included in Wikipedia. WP:VERIFY (a Wikipedia policy) says that; The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—what counts is whether readers can verify that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true. I have no reason to doubt the truth of what you've added— and I'm not saying it isn't interesting information that would be welcome elsewhere—but if it can't be verified from a reliable third-party publication, then it can't be included in Wikipedia. DrFrench (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Boo! I'll scale back the info...