User talk:Stpatel137/sandbox


 * Very well organized


 * Try to use more citations or have at least one for each section
 * Try to include more info from recent research studies
 * Could use more hyperlinks

(Jgill224)

--Sweiner02 (talk) 03:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm finding information on the mechanism. Don't neglect basic info about proliferation, etc. This has some good info: https://www.jscisociety.com/article.asp?issn=0974-5009;year=2020;volume=47;issue=1;spage=3;epage=7;aulast=Negi
 * I'd like to see a lot more terms linked to their wiki pages the first time they are used.
 * Needs citations for all subsections of diagnosis.
 * Some of this reads more like it's written for a patient than a general reader. Be careful of that.
 * Cite the epidemiology section.
 * Missing research section.
 * Your structure is good, and with a few exceptions, the article is well cited. There are some pieces that still need to be finished.

--Stpatel137 (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Some terms did not have its own wikipedia page, so instead, I put the meaning of the word in parentheses.

--ChiDoc0517 (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Great job including information in the abstract.
 * Since there may be limited information, is it possible to condense the mechanism/pathophysiology and pathogenesis sections into one?  The pathophysiology section would be describing the biological process of a condition becoming a disease, but that could be explained in the mechanism.
 * For the prognosis section, are there any residual effects of having a COC? After having treatment, will they have full function of their jaw without difficulty? If so, it might be helpful to add that here.
 * For the causes section, is there any information on how odontogenic epithelial remnants develop or become trapped in the bones to develop the cyst? Does anything place someone at a higher risk of the remnants developing?

--Stpatel137 (talk) 03:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I explained the odontogenic epithelial remnants in the Mechanism/Pathophysio section.


 * The introduction is well written, and has lots of information on the disease. This is the most viewed section and would most likely help viewers understand more about the disease

Haneefav1 (talk) 03:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * With the epidemiology, any information about how it was found and where it was found might be beneficial to the general public and would seem more efficient
 * For the diagnosis, maybe just grouping the scans together and linking the scans would help users understand the exams that are needed
 * The causes of the disease, maybe adding a little more information to that section since no mechanism or pathogenesis has little to know the information in that section


 * I did not group the scans together because they are two different types of imaging procedures for diagnostics of the diease, however, I did link the scans.


 * As for the causes, I was able to find the mechanism and added the mechanism section.

--Stpatel137 (talk) 03:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)