User talk:Stradivari7

Guide to referencing
Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Saatchi Gallery has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Saatchi Gallery constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Saatchi Gallery. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 4twenty42o (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Saatchi Gallery
Knock it off please. Explain your changes or you will be reported. 4twenty42o (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello 4twenty42o (talk) 2 the reason why I took down the court case article is because number one isn't related to the subject we talk about the gallery not the man, would make more sense on Charles Saatchi page that the Gallery Page and secondly more important the court case never got actually in court the reason why the saatchi left the county hall was because they sold most of the stuff to invest in the new site , the only ref you use over the court case is an old article which not longer is valid.
 * So there for we miss giving info.( Stradivari7)

The information is about what happened to the gallery. This cannot be detached from the man, as he is integral to it. It should also be included on the Charles Saatchi page. The material appeared in the media and is cited to reliable sources used per wikipedia policy of WP:NPOV. The statement you made above is not substantiated and therefore not allowable per WP:NOR. Wikipedia works by consensus: this matter has been discussed on the article talk page at Talk:Saatchi_Gallery. If you disagree with the conclusion there, you will have to argue your case to change consensus. At the moment you are edit warring and per WP:3RR will get blocked from editing if you continue to do so.  Ty  23:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Stradivari7 can any of you explain to me why is the court case not on his page? why no one has talked about the up coming tv show ?


 * can the court case article being moved in the controversy bit? instead of being a long bit which isn't interesting at all?


 * thanks for feed backs {stradivari7}


 * First point - see below. Second point: court case is not a controversy: it's part of the chronology of the gallery, its history. Please keep talk about the same subject in the same section. Please read the message about signing. You can indent talk by putting a colon : in front of the first word, or two colons :: to indent two spaces.  Ty  02:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Sign
As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Talk page guidelines. Thank you.  Ty  23:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Saatchi Gallery 2

 * [User:Tyrenius| so why isn't on his page ? I think it should be edited because the so call source is just a news paper, maybe it should be in the section of controversy I don't think is actually that important to have a big section , when so much more interesting could have being putted up.
 * Where are the info about the up coming tv show? the book?  the middle east exhibition, you all seem to have a clear idea on what or what not should be edited but not one has actually done or add anything to that page till now that I try to edited not remove that was a mistake . (stradivari7)

If you think it should be there, then put it there, probably modifying it to keep the parts most relevant to him. This is a volunteer project, not a job, so no one can be blamed for not doing something. Articles are in progress; they are not finished work. I disagree: I think it is important and it changed the whole history of the gallery. It is about the right size: it's the other sections that need to be expanded. There is plenty of room to add more information, so feel free to add material about the TV show and the book (and reference it - see above). A lot of work has been done on that page. Read Talk:Saatchi Gallery and Talk:Saatchi Gallery/Archive 1. The problem was that certain individuals, who seemed to have a connection with the gallery, tried to remove a lot of information and use the page as an advert. This took up a lot of editors' time to deal with. I think people got a bit fed up with this and haven't bothered to edit the page much since.  Ty  02:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)