User talk:Straightplayer21

University of New England (Australia)
I refer to your edits to the article University of New England (Australia) on May 25, 2014. Firstly welcome to wikipedia and thanks for your interest in editing. Please be advised, however, that wikipedia is not an opinion article. It is an encyclopaedia. One of the core guidelines of wikipedia is No original research. If you wish to add criticism to an article, it must come from a reliable source. The reliable source must also directly criticise the subject.

For example, you have mentioned that the vice-chancellor's salary is higher than the prime ministers. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant. Unless you can find a reliable source that criticises the fact that the vice chancellor is paid more than the PM, you cannot add this information to a criticism or 'concerns' section. The source must specifically criticise the issue, finding a source that simply confirms the vice-chancellor earns more would not be enough, nor would you be able to synthesis this information: as per WP:SYNTH: synthesis is also not allowed on wikipedia. "If a single source says "A" in one context, and "B" in another, without connecting them, and does not provide an argument of "therefore C", then "therefore C" cannot be used in any article."

In addition to WP:RS and WP:NOR, please also read Template:Cite web for an approved method of formatting references on wikipedia. I have reverted your edits as they do not fit in line with wikipedia's guidelines. You are welcome to try and add criticism to the article as long as it adheres to guidelines. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 09:42, 25 May 2014 (UTC)