User talk:Straightshoot101

Proposed deletion of Kofi Danso


The article Kofi Danso has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet notability criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. References given do not discuss him significantly, and Google search for the name does not come up with anything that does, except for a couple of newspaper articles discussing controversy surrounding him."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  00:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kofi Danso for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kofi Danso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kofi Danso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  00:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Kofi Danso deletion
Kofi Danso, is my first article creation, I’m willing to improve the article to save it from deletion. Can anyone advise how best I can do that? Straightshoot101 (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It can be moved to draft space where you can work on it. ... disco spinster   talk  15:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Ok great thanks, will do that today Straightshoot101 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Uebert Angel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 22:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2022
Promoting Uebert Angel and hiding criticism of him seems to be one of your main purposes on Wikipedia. Note that tendentious editing is not allowed. Bishonen &#124; tålk 10:52, 16 September 2022 (UTC).


 * Not at all @Bishonen. The entry/s was non factual and speculative and cited unreliable sources. Straightshoot101 (talk) 11:08, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Really? As I asked in my revert of your blanking activity, do you seriously think these sources are less reliable than the ones used for the promotional section "Humanitarian activities"? Anyway, you have now been blocked from editing the page, so there's not much point in you and me discussing it further. Save it for an unblock request, if you think you have a case. And don't forget to defend your previous promotional activity at the page. Bishonen &#124; tålk 11:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC).

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Uebert Angel) for promotional pov editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 11:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Doug, the content I removed was literally wild news articles, no evidence or convictions, just rumour pieces, likely made up for clicks. I don't think I deserve blocking for that, but I will not delete large sections again without maybe going in the talk section? I am not sure the best way to contest content. Straightshoot101 (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You can use the article's talk page still, and you can ask at WP:RSN about reliability of sources. Doug Weller  talk 15:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)