User talk:Strasburger

Welcome!
Hello, Strasburger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Email
I received your email. This is your "user talk page". If you were asking me to clarify something then I don't understand your question. RJFJR (talk) 04:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for creating my User Talk page. I was puzzled in my email because I vaguely remembered I already had one - I understand now that was in the German edition of Wikipedia, though. It is called "Benutzer Diskussion:Strasburger" there. I also have the accompanying German "user page", called "Benutzer:Strasburger" but don't have the English equivalent yet ("User:Strasburger"). Should I create one? I could copy all the stuff from my German version. It might be better, though, to avoid having multiple personalities. Is there a way to cross-link these pages? What would you recommend? --Strasburger (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You can create a user page, it's optional. You could put a link on your user page on the English Wikipedia that links to your German page with link to user page on the German Wikipedia using a piped reference and the interwiki prefix de:.  RJFJR (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I have done that. However, the link does not show up (same syntax as your's). What happened? --Strasburger (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Weird. It must have something to do with a difference between talk pages and non-talk pages.  I fixed by using my user page on the German Wikipedia (i.e. I added the leading colon.)  If you are really curious you could ask at village pump technical, they will probably know about this.  RJFJR (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the fix

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 12:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 11:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 11:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 02:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception


Hello Strasburger. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "European Conference on Visual Perception".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 13:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception


Hello, Strasburger. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "European Conference on Visual Perception".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Traquair 1938 Clinical Perimetry Chpt 1 p 4.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Traquair 1938 Clinical Perimetry Chpt 1 p 4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Traquair 1938 Clinical Perimetry Chpt 1 p 4.png
Thanks for uploading File:Traquair 1938 Clinical Perimetry Chpt 1 p 4.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Optical illusions
Hello: I notice you reverted my edit here, with the comment "The discussion is on the talk page for Optical illusions". That really isn't good enough: The template, which is for notifying renaming requests has a prominent link to "this categories entry at the categories for discussion page". If the request is to mean anything you need to post a rationale for it at the CfD page, not just assume everyone will know what you mean. And currently, as the main article for the category is still at Optical illusion, and categories and their main articles should match, a category move is unlikely to succeed without the other taking place first. So I would suggest you a). post a rationale for this move at CfD and take your chances, or b). delete the template until the article rename issue is resolved. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. The renaming of the article should indeed be the first step. I undid my revert. Strasburger (talk) 14:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

PS: As the renaming discussion at Talk:Optical Illusion doesn't seem to be going anywhere, perhaps you should consider opening a Move Request at WP:RM; though if you do you will need a rationale that circumvents WP:COMMONNAME, which at present weighs heavily against it. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 15:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * One (partial) reason why the discussion stopped could be that everybody working on the subject was at the ECVP. Anyway, I will not push the matter for the moment because the article has numerous serious issues that can be (and should be) addressed first. It is not just that citations are missing (as indicated) and there should be a warning to that end for the reader (but I do not know what template would do that). Currently I am compiling a list of what should be done. As to WP:COMMONNAME", the reasoning will be that "Ambiguous[6] or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources", pointing to the scientific literature on the subject. Strasburger (talk) 14:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)