User talk:Strawfan

Tip on edits
Hi, I noticed you're adding "best" to "known for" in some articles. Please read through MOS:PUFFERY. Unless you're attributing that label to a specific source (citing a reference), you shouldn't add "best". Happy editing! Schazjmd  (talk)  00:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Since you haven't fixed the edits you'd made before my comment and are continuing to make the same edit in other articles, I've removed "best" from the articles you've edited. It's particularly ridiculous when an article has "best known for" and "also best known for". Please stop adding unsourced and unattributed puffery to articles. Schazjmd   (talk)  16:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone  ( open channel ) 00:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Christopher Lloyd; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)