User talk:Street Scholar

December 2007
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN we need to talk.  16:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Intothefire (talk) 03:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jaan
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jaan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Jaan. Thank you. --Jerzy•t 17:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Unsourced content on Cheema Article
Hi Street Scholar It seems that you are one of the main contributors of the Cheema article. The article needs some improvement for example
 * It is replete with  sweeping personal opinions not backed by proper citations or verifiable sources.
 * Citations do not carry the proper page ref.
 * Citations from primary sources not backed by secondary of tertiary sources.
 * Unrelated information or information that needs inputs that establish relation.

I also hope that you are not using a sockpuppet to post on various other articles.

Cheers Intothefire (talk) 03:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Intothefire (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Chach Nama a primary source and written by a Kazi appointed by Qasim himself
Hi Street Scholar I see you have used the Chach Nama as a source to insert information and quotes to various articles and Stubs such as Raja Sahasi II Rani Suhanadi‎  Cheema to name a few. After a long and protracted discussion with various user including Tigroo (who is now banned because of using many sockpuppets) it was concluded and agreed that the Chach Nama can not be cited as it is a primary source specially since it was written by Kàzí Ismáíl. Kází Ismàíl was appointed the first Kází of Alór by Muhammad Kásim after the conquest of the place.

Please ref to my comment on the discussion page of the Talk:Chach Nama where I have provided the complete citations for this information as well.

Would appreciate your comments. Cheers Intothefire (talk) 03:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA
Please follow the instructions on creating a 2nd nomination, as you are trying to transclude your old RFA from 2007. I should also note that I don't believe you will have success at this point, having just come back from a rather lengthy wikibreak. –xenotalk 18:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Odd speedies
First a speedy deletion tag on Portal:Feminism, a featured portal, and now an A7 on Feminism. A7 can't be applied to a movement or theory, and in any case, there are plenty of assertions of notability on the page. Care to explain? --Gimme danger (talk) 21:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Britisharmy.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Britisharmy.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Dougweller (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Your message on my talk page says "I understand wiki policy very well, and I did not insult anyone, so your warning was spurious, and using your position as an admin to threaten other users, which is a violation of wiki policy. I think you owe me an apology on my talk page.".
 * First, any editor can leave warnings, not just administrators. But I expect you know that.
 * Secondly, it wasn't a threat, it was a warning that actions have consequences.
 * And here is what you wrote: "Are you trying to question me just because I am a man and this does not conform to your perverted ideology?" - 'your perverted ideology' was clearly an attack. About 45 minutes later the editor you attacked responded asking why you were putting inapproppriate speedy delete tags on articles, with the edit summary " I love a personal attack in the late afternoon.". Amd about a quarter of an hour later you added "fuck you bitch, I don't need to explain myself to you, maybe you are confusing me for your husband." . Two clear personal attacks. Seven minutes later you redacted that comment saying it was a mistake. However, you did it, didn't apologise, and didn't redact the bit about 'perverted ideology'. So no, I am  not apologising, and you are free to take up your actions and mine anywhere you want. The warning is a valid one and hopefully the last one you will ever get. Dougweller (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Sufi Saints of South Asia
Hello Street Scholar. I notice that you are interested in Sufism. I have put forth a request on the Reward Board for assistance in bringing the Sufi Saints of South Asia article to at least B-class. All meaningful contributors will get barnstars. The article is in dire need of being developed. It is an important article in relation to Islam in South Asia. Please help in developing the article. Regards--Shahab (talk) 06:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism with misleading edit summaries
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. This account has allegedly been compromised, not for the first time (see 2009 incidents). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes I am aware of that, I share accommodation and I always autofill and remember log ins on my account normally I make sure to lock the computer when I am away. Street Scholar (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * So you're going to play and indefinite ban on the account? --


 * No need to be pretentious (you could have handled it professionally) I do understand the meaning and I did read the WP:GAB, why do I have an indefinite block why did he change it from a timed block to an indefinite block the next day? Street Scholar (talk)

Proposed deletion of Ram Swarup Joon


The article Ram Swarup Joon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ACADEMIC - a soldier who wrote one book, which has minimal hits on GBooks and GScholar and whose many GHits seem mostly to be mirrors of this article or the others on Wikipedia in which he is cited. There has been a discussion at the India project about reliability etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 15:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Siharus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siharus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Siharus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jethwarp (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Street Scholarpic1.jpg
 * File:Street Scholar2.jpg
 * File:Street Scholar8.jpg

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Street Scholar2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Street Scholar2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:44, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Street Scholar8.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Street Scholar8.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:44, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Street Scholarpic1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Street Scholarpic1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cheema Villages


The article Cheema Villages has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is supposed to be a list of villages inhabited by members of the Cheema community.. It is mostly redlinks and the bluelinks are impossible to verify because there has been no useful census of caste since 1931. No surprise, then, that it has been tagged for sources since 2007.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 20:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)