User talk:StrictlyTopSecret

Chronohabituation
A template has been added to the article Chronohabituation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  W ODU P  02:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chronohabituation
Chronohabituation, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Chronohabituation satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Chronohabituation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Chronohabituation during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  W ODU P  04:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)