User talk:StrikeDog

Reference errors on 31 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * On the List of terrorist incidents in July 2016 page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=732402569 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F732402569%7CList of terrorist incidents in July 2016%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents in August 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:VPP discussion about terrorism
There is a VPP discussion about distinguishing between terrorist attacks and non-terrorist attacks, if you would like to participate. Parsley Man (talk) 07:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Classification of terrorist incidents


The article Classification of terrorist incidents has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:INDISCRIMINATE listing of WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Classification of terrorist incidents for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Classification of terrorist incidents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Classification of terrorist incidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of terrorist incidents in August 2017. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 08:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

This stuff is just ridiculous
How brainless do people have to be to think that having a flag means that someone will think that that country is responsible. Not only is it pointless and accomplishes nothing, the article looks worst visually — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeinzMaster (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That's what I've been saying. The article looks worse without the flags than with them. It's really only DeFacto that is against the flags. Everyone else is either against or just blindly following one side. StrikeDog (talk) 00:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

"Talcum X" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Talcum X. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)