User talk:Striker2020

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film) into Lego Harry Potter. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part into The Lego Movie (2014 theme). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lego Cars 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top Gear. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Characters of Overwatch into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI help 19:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lego Juniors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helen Parr.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Jkmartindale. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lego Monkie Kid without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. We can also take this discussion to the article talk page if you want to discuss how to best reformat its content. Thanks. jkmartindale (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Lego citations
Hi it's really great to see your work on the Lego articles! I just wanted to raise an issue I noticed with the use of citations. When you add four or five citations to illustrate one point, it really breaks up the text and makes it unreadable. You really don't need so many refs, and especially not direct links to Lego. Plus it's best not to add them in the middle of the sentences. Shall we try to improve these pages with fewer refs? Happy to chat about this. Fieryninja (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Construction Sets
Hi, I notice you've been adding the phrase "Construction Sets" or changing "Sets" to "Construction Sets" on a lot of LEGO articles. I'm wondering what your thinking is there? Thanks, AntiVan (talk) 07:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries please :)
Hello I see that you are really active on Wikipedia; awesome! Thank you for your contributions! I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. I am kindly asking that you provide even the most simple edit summaries. Again, otherwise it is very difficult to discern why edits are being made or what changes are being made as a whole. Thanks! PerpetuityGrat (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Good work
Well done on the Lego Overwatch page :) Fieryninja (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for telling me and now my Lego Overwatch page look ok. For the Lego The Powerpuff Girls page I wait for the result whether editor want to merge or not. Striker2020 (talk) 05:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Elves
Hi do you have any good sources for Lego Elves? I'm really struggling to find anything such as the air dates for the series. Thanks Fieryninja (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi here are the 2 sources from imdb  about the air dates for Lego Elves series. Striker2020 (talk) 14:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi thanks for these. I don't think I'm allowed to use IMDb though but if you come across any more then let me know. I'm wondering whether to list the webisodes on the page in a table format similar to the Monkie Kid page. What do you think? Fieryninja (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi yes you can list out the webisodes on the page in a table format similar to the Monkie Kid page.Striker2020 (talk) 05:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Minions
Hi I noticed Minions is missing from the list of themes. Are you working on it? Fieryninja (talk) 14:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * yes I'm still working on it with the Minions but still insufficient because I struggle finding the sources for the development and reception just like Lego Trolls, The Lord of the Rings and The Powerpuff Girls. I have a good news my Brickheadz almost going to get ready for tomorrow or next week. Striker2020 (talk) 05:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * here is a new source []. Fieryninja (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks for this source. Striker2020 (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia (4th request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Lego Jurassic World (theme). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Legoland Billund Resort into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia.   —  Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 09:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Suggestion
have you considered using Twinkle? - See WP:TW It's useful for when you want to rollback several edits that are disruptive or vandalism, rather than having to do a manual revert. Fieryninja (talk) 06:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * sure I will use this Twinkle. Striker2020 (talk) 07:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Fantastic Voyage, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego Art logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lego Art logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Power Rangers Wild Force characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Some off-site help?
You hang out quite frequently on the Lego Vidiyo page, right? Visokor (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I just update a bit on Lego Vidiyo page. I need your help according to the Brickfanatics it said the first wave of Bandmates and BeatBoxes already retired last year [] but the Brickset[] and Brickeconomy[] said not retire yet. But I'm not quite sure which one is the right one? Striker2020 (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Another help for my Lego Fusion page. Can you please help me to find another source for the development section? Striker2020 (talk) 13:36, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I was more or less thinking about having some help on here? https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Toys/LegoVidiyo But it's surprising the theme turned out to be a commercial disaster... Visokor (talk) 08:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A cookie for you
it's nice to have a cookies and I really like it. Striker2020 (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego BrickHeadz.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lego BrickHeadz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego Minions The Rise of Gru.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lego Minions The Rise of Gru.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego Minions The Rise of Gru.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lego Minions The Rise of Gru.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Promotional quotes
Hello. Thanks for creating all of the Lego articles. It's fine to quote positive reviews by independent sources, but please note that long, enthusiastic quotes about a product from employees of any company generally read like WP:Advertising, and shouldn't be added to a Wikipedia article. I love Lego too, but articles need to be written from a WP:Neutral point of view. Thanks. 217.127.250.215 (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Lego The Simpsons
Nice job, I'm marking as reviewed. I removed the "characters" section. It's not a copyvio, because you attributed it, but it's duplicative, so it seemed unnecessary. Maybe rewrite it as more Lego-centric. Thanks again for the work on the article Andre🚐 21:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)