User talk:Stripy Socks

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Stripy Socks! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! User:Marek69. 00:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Peter Facinelli
First of all, we just don't as a matter of practice combine rows over roles. It can easily be messed up, and only the first appearance should be linked to other articles. Facinelli has at least 5 future film roles and some of those may well usurp Breaking Dawn in the chronology of his roles, which is a good indicator for why we don't combine role rows. As for Breaking Dawn, we generally do not list films that aren't in production and I can't find a source to support that the film has started filming. It also is set for a November 2011 release, so the date was wrong. We don't use facebook or other similar fansites or blogs as references. All I can find for Breaking Dawn is that it is in preproduction, so we don't list it until it starts filming. Collider.com is not considered a reliable source to add to content. It needs film standard publication. I see nothing I reverted that goes against standard practices for future roles and filmography listings. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Anything poorly, inadequately or unsourced is automatically subject to deletion until proof is offered via a reliable source. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That would depend on what part of IMDb you mean. Nothing in the biographies, trivia facts or any other user contributed content is acceptable. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think anyone is disputing that these actors have signed on for the film, what we need to wait on to list it in filmographies is that it begins filming. It certainly isn't going to start filming until Eclipse opens since promoting that film will be a priority. When it starts filming, it is officially in production and can be listed. Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It can go back in the narrative with a reliable source. We can't use YouTube because of copyright issues with their posts and sky.com seems a little shaky to me. If there is a source from a major newspaper, that would work. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Mostly because it isn't a source that is widely used on Wikipedia and I'd be more comfortable with reports from trade papers or major publications. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok Magazine and Yahoo Movies are good sources. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Eclipse
I am not sure why you keep taking out the piece on vampire movies, this is an interesting phenemena of this generation that I feel is worth pointing out, in two years it could be werewolves or some other fictional character, I just find this is of interest. please don't just keep taking out this section with no explaination. Pumkinhead001 (talk)

Thanks for the Advice
I appreciate your suggestion. Pumkinhead001 (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Tiny Furniture
Thanks so much for your help with this article, it looks great now! Pumkinhead001 (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Ashley Greene
this was unhelpful; please don't do this ;) Cheers, Jack Merridew 18:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)