User talk:Struckdheart

Ankush sharma moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ankush sharma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Bilorv ( talk ) 21:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

There are many tv links and YouTube videos and Sony private network show kbc season 12 episode no 44 on Ankush Sharma

I am providing all the links under

https://www.indiatoday.in/television/reality-tv/story/kbc-12-contestant-ankush-sharma-failed-to-answer-this-rs-50-lakh-question-can-you-1744494-2020-11-27 ▼ https://kbcliv.in/kbc-contestant-ankush-sharma-from-jammu-here-are-questions-asked-from-him/ ▼ There are many interviews and supportive links to his success in kaun banega crorepati. https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/article/kbc-12-the-rs-50-lakh-question-related-to-slumdog-millionaire-that-ankush-sharma-couldnt-answer-on-amitabh-bachchans-show-kaun-banega-crorepati/687268 ▼ https://www.zeebiz.com/hindi/india/kbc-12-rs-50-lakh-slumdog-millionaire-kaun-banega-crorepati-questions-by-amitabh-bachchan-that-ankush-sharma-could-not-answer-39011 ▼ https://m.timesofindia.com/tv/news/hindi/kaun-banega-crorepati-12-amitabh-bachchan-is-elated-to-know-that-the-contestant-watched-his-movie-deewar-more-than-fifty-times/amp_articleshow/79442473.cms ▼ ▲ https://www.indiatoday.in/television/reality-tv/story/kbc-12-contestant-ankush-sharma-failed-to-answer-this-rs-50-lakh-question-can-you-1744494-2020-11-27 ▲ https://kbcliv.in/kbc-contestant-ankush-sharma-from-jammu-here-are-questions-asked-from-him/ ▲ In episode, Ankush Sharma appeared on the show. Being a vertically challenged person, Ankush revealed how his father talked to him about the challenges he might face. The contestant also spoke about his love life too. While answering a question on Hrithik Roshan, the contestant shared that he is a huge Shah Rukh Khan fan. ▲ https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/article/kbc-12-the-rs-50-lakh-question-related-to-slumdog-millionaire-that-ankush-sharma-couldnt-answer-on-amitabh-bachchans-show-kaun-banega-crorepati/687268 ▲ Amitabh Bachchan went on to share how SRK is one of the most talented stars in India and has been tagged as the romantic hero of Bollywood. Talking about the same, Ankush revealed that his favourite film is Mohabbatein and that it was SRK's films that helped him become a romantic at heart. Struckdheart (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi ! If you add information from these sources into the draft, and cite them as references, then you can submit the draft for approval. But articles need to be neutrally written (no encouraging users to watch things or advertising) with good grammar and spelling, and ideally formatting similar to that of other Wikipedia articles. You can ask for help with specific problems if you struggle with any of these aspects at the Teahouse. Neutrality also applies also to other edits, such as at Bishnah. Mentioning Sharma at that page is not really appropriate without a standalone article on the individual. Thanks! — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

There are some stand alone articles and even videos. Lots of newspaper cutting and full fledge show on international channel. Struckdheart (talk) 19:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, but you need to incorporate information from such sources into the draft and make sure it has good grammar, spelling and formatting. Then a reviewer can properly assess it. Let's leave Sharma out of Bishnah unless the draft about Sharma is approved. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes we will try to get it approved by some Verified user as i am associated with Sony pictures television. So i am managing the edits and will get it done by the channel media partners. Thank you Struckdheart (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bishnah. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Possibly (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Ok Struckdheart (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Possibly (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok Struckdheart (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Struckdheart. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You must not edit Bishnah or other articles directly, instead going through draft approval processes or making requested edits. Otherwise you may be blocked. You must create a userpage with a template such as UserboxCOI or Paid to disclosure your conflict of interest. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Stop
If you ever make another accusation like this again without proof, you should expect to be blocked. If you have off-wiki evidence, email it to WP:Arbcom. CUPIDICAE💕 20:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes i do have all the evidence. But tell me where to share the screenshots? Shall i go to Twitter tags? Struckdheart (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think this even needs saying, but Struckdheart's claims are untrue. I have never asked for or received money for any edits I have made on Wikipedia and have never contacted this user except in the on-wiki ways publicly viewable. — Bilorv ( talk ) 20:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at COIN
Stop removing the post at COIN. If you continue, all that you will achieve is getting yourself blocked from Wikipedia. Possibly (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Lets see. I am not here to listen these baseless allegations. I have valid info to post Struckdheart (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ankush sharma


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ankush sharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ankush sharma (February 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ankush sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ankush sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ankush_sharma Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ankush_sharma reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 20:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)