User talk:Stryker187

Please note
it is inappropriate for the person who created the article to remove the speedy delete tag. Please use the hangon tag and then list reason on the article's talk page to explain why you think the article should not be deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 07:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * It is even more inappropriate to remove content that challenges the speedy delete tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stryker187 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * As this diff shows, all I did was replace the speedy delete tag and the hang on. I made no other changes. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 07:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Really then where did the changes that I made for which I have now placed back go. I think you hit undo not just add the code back, which stangely his what the history says you did. I am curious what other proof would be revelant, paystubs from the latest movie I worked on, sales records of breaker geeks. Just curious.


 * Yes, I hit undo, and it shows in the diff at the top exactly what effect that had. As for what other information you need, you need to demonstrate Notability through reliable third party sources &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 07:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes I know I was being sarcastic. Everything I claim which is not alot is verifiable, I will seek more 3d party links but it is late and I have real work in the mean time. (Only 187studios is 1st party btw)