User talk:StryoFome

Per WP:DUCK test. Account created right after the latest sock was created; identical editing profiles; systematically edits same articles (Doug Besterman, Sandra Church, Janet Dacal, Rory O'Malley); same bad image uploads; immediately saw when B&B's upload File:Dougbesterman.jpg was tagged for deletion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Dacal, Besterman, O'Malley. All people who have shows on Broadway this season. Many people have seen The Book of Mormon (O'Malley), How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying/Sister Act/The People in the Picture (Besterman), and Wonderland (Dacal). Church doesn't make sense, B&B never touched it. Many accounts can be created on the same day. My text contributions are helpful. I explained the images in my unblock request. I am truly sorry for the images, but I can't apologize for something I didn't do.--StryoFome (talk) 17:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by identical editing profiles?--StryoFome (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm, your style in making unblock requests and professing your innocence matches the other guy's too. Do you really want me to go and have your IPs checked if they match? Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * On the S.S. Miami talk page, the editor asks, "[B]lock [me] from uploading images, but not from editing." Is there a reason that was not done before? I think it would've prevented S.S.'s copyright problems.--StryoFome (talk) 18:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not his/her sockpuppet, but perhaps I could reach some sort of agreement with you? ie: if I upload a bad image again I will be blocked without question?--StryoFome (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * BTW, becoming a wild deletionist doesn't help.--StryoFome (talk) 18:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Help
User:Future Perfect at Sunrise has deleted a bunch of images just because I uploaded them, even perfectly fine images. This is not savory; these images are improving Wikipedia, and I believe that Sunrise has become a deletionist. I would file a report, but I can't, so can someone please do so or re-upload the images? It was not in violation of a ban or block; they were uploaded before the block!--StryoFome (talk) 18:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You need to sort out your block first - you cannot evade it by asking other people to repeat your actions for you -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't repeat my actions; re-upload the good images (like War Horse, Sandra Church in Gypsy, Catch Me If You Can - those ones).--StryoFome (talk) 18:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Wait for your unblock request to be addressed! Any attempt to get other people to do things for you while you are blocked is an abuse of your Talk page - if you reinstate this helpme request again I will revoke your Talk page access -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for telling me.--StryoFome (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Note to reviewing admin: the link in the checkuser to User:Bialytock&Bloom is unambiguous; and SS Miami admits to being B&B here. --jpgordon:==( o ) 17:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You may be biased due to you involvement in the B&B blocking, and I've already explained the IP.--StryoFome (talk) 19:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm biased against serial abusers of multiple accounts such as yourself. --jpgordon:==( o ) 20:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. And I've already explained enough about how I haven't abused multiple accounts; I only have one, I only use one: StryoFome. I've explained the IP, vowed never to upload a bad image again, and that's all I can do. If you can't believe me, then so be it, but I have no intention to break the rules of Wikipedia, only improve it, as anyone can clearly see from my text contributions.--StryoFome (talk) 21:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Another sock

 * User:Mamma_Rose is definitely another sock of User:S.S. Miami/User:Bialytock&Bloom/User:StryoFome.
 * Why else would he/she a) come to User:S.S. Miami's user page? and b) delete (and then reinstate) the edit about him/her being a sock of User:S.S. Miami?  If it's not true, why hasn't he/she kicked up a fuss about it?  I would if I was wrongly accused. User:Mamma Rose has decided keeping a low profile is the best policy, don't draw attention to him/herself and he/she might get away with it. [diff = http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S.S._Miami&diff=prev&oldid=434939145]
 * He/she uploaded a photo without proper copyright, which was then removed from Commons [diff = http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mamma_Rose&diff=prev&oldid=434664854]. On 18 June he/she re-uploaded the photo [File : Addamsfamilymusical.jpg], plus another non-copyright photo - the old behaviour of Miami, User:Bialytock&Bloom and User:StryoFome
 * Added a welcome template to his/her own talk page, signed by himself/herself, in which he/she says "I am Mamma Rose and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, [my bolding] so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page." This was on 15 June, when User:Mamma_Rose had been editing for just 2 days. [diff = http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mamma_Rose&diff=prev&oldid=434478753]
 * The same day joined the Wikiproject Musical Theatre, [diff = http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musical_Theatre&diff=prev&oldid=434441185]. Of the last seven editors to join, four are User:S.S. Miami, User:Bialytock&Bloom, User:StryoFome and User:Mamma_Rose.
 * Is editing almost exactly the same articles as User:S.S. Miami, User:Bialytock&Bloom, User:StryoFome, especially those created by his/her earlier socks. 86.133.51.89 (talk) 15:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)