User talk:Stsfi

Star Trek: SFI
A template has been added to the article Star Trek: SFI, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:LEGAL - ''If you make legal threats, you may be blocked from editing so that the matter is not exacerbated through other than legal channels. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely, while legal threats are outstanding.'' - please retract your legal threat against myself and wikipedia or you will be blocked. --Fredrick day 10:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edits concerning Star Trek: SFI
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest.
 * Wikipedia is not a promotional service, a crystal ball, or an advertisement service, please review our 'what wikipedia is not' policy. Thanks.  --Beetstra (public) (Dirk BeetstraT  C on public computers) 11:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Star Trek: SFI
Hi Stsfi. Thank you for your polite request. The page was deleted as it failed to meet our rules concerning notability and reliable sources. In order for an article to exist on Wikipedia, it must explain why its topic is notable in its field, and provide reliable references to support that (such as in newspapers, notable websites, journals, and so on). You might find Why was my page deleted? interesting reading. I hope you will still consider contributing to Wikipedia. Neil  ☎  11:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You find after a bit of practice that it's actually easier to use than HTML - if it is of any comfort, what was there before deletion was formatted properly. If you are able to provide some references for Star Trek:SFI (its own web site would not count), then there'd be no problem in recreating the article.  Neil   ☎  11:46, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If the personal interview was hosted on the ST:SFI website, then it would not be an appropriate source. Uninvolved third party references are required; otherwise we would have millions of articles from people on a topic they had made up themselves and created a website to support it.  You could read Verifiability - this is one of our core policies and explains things better than I could. Best,  Neil   ☎  13:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for three-revert rule violation, legal threats. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. &mdash; madman bum and angel 15:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually make that an indefininite block for the legal threat. This can be lifted immediately you rescind the threat. You will also need to sit out the original 72 hour block first. Spartaz Humbug! 22:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)