User talk:StuartBrewer

Lacrosse
Three times now, you have added unsourced expansion statements to the NLL page about the league's desire to expand to the US. I have reverted the change twice, and for some reason, you keep re-adding it. Why?

"Possible cities for expansion include" is meaningless -- there are hundreds of "possible cities for expansion", but if nobody from the NLL has publicly stated that these cities are being considered, then the statement adds nothing.

Please don't add statements like this without some kind of source or reference -- point me to a news source, and we can add the reference to the page. If you don't have such a reference, you can't add the statement. Please see Verifiability. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 17:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding sections entitled "Broadcast History" thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 01:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the second time: Please stop adding those sections, wikipedia represents a worldwide view and you are also duplicating existent sections. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the 3rd time; Your actions are now brinking on disruption! - Please cease. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I would like you to stop; We don't put sections like "U.S. Broadcast history" or "UK broadcast history" because wikipedia is a world-wide encyclopaedia.. what we do have are sections entitled "International distribution" which incidentally your sections are just duplicating. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 16:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by CBS
It's not 2008 yet, please do not add (2008-present) to shows until they premiere (and certainly not before 2008)! --Mhking (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

"On Hiatus"
In the NBC program listing, you've used the term "on hiatus" to describe some shows; firstly, that is not an official term used by the networks to describe those shows, secondly, it is not confirmed that those shows will return one way or another. They remain on the official network roster, but their status may change. --Mhking (talk) 18:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Please cite information that you add to an article. Unsourced material will be removed as it will be deemed as vandalism. ''  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  05:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Aeon Flux - good one!
Good addition to the list of box office bombs. 67.135.49.42 (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Lists of film series
Hi - I notice you'd added a future film to one of the lists. As this film is not yet released, it would count as speculation (which is against Wikipedia policy), so I have removed it again. Please could you only make additions to the film lists for films which have been released. Maybe you if you have any comments to make, you'd like to get involved on the relevant talk pages. Robsinden (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of 2010 box office number-one films in the United States
A tag has been placed on List of 2010 box office number-one films in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You can re-create this page at the end of the year, when the facts are known. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Free agents
Please stop changing the articles. They cannot officially sign until tomorrow. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS, so we wait until they are officially a member of the team. This goes for Boozer, Bosh, Wade, LeBron, etc.  Enigma msg  01:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Box Office Weekend Lists are for three day weekends only
The List of 2011 box office number-one films in the United States and the years before that for three day weekends only. Holidays are not included. For example, look at the List of 2010 box office number-one films in the United States. Shrek Forever After's weekend total is $43,311,063, which is a three day total. In the List of 2009 box office number-one films in the United States Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian's total is $54,173,286. Their Memorial day grosses are not included. And1987 (talk) 20:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Friday night death slot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friday night death slot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Friday night death slot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --George Ho (talk) 09:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for filling-out the year-by-year sections
Please don't pipe the team names the way you've been doing though. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)