User talk:Stuart Ward UK

Wangiri
Another editor has added the  template to the article Wangiri, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barmoor


The article Barmoor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of significance or notability, either as a house or hotel.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 14:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bad Voltage


A tag has been placed on Bad Voltage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fenix down (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:RHaworth. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One-time password, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SS7 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/One-time_password check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/One-time_password?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)