User talk:Stubbsey

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy vranari


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Andy vranari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:28, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Boris Johnson— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 16:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Semmendinger. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Boris Johnson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Semmendinger (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Boris Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 16:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm -glove-(alt, public). I noticed that you made a change to an article, Boris Johnson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There was no sourcing you gave for your edit, and your edit seemed to say it like it is a known fact, please rephrase it to be more neutral and provide a source. -glove-(alt, public) (talk) (main account's talk) 17:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)