User talk:Student7/Proposed MOS talk page standards

Feedback on MOS discussion standards
1. Very well done. Very much needed. Does not take any stands on the content or even on the style of discussion (citing sources). I think that is wise.

1.5. "three pages" of talk is unclear what you mean. Three screens? Some sort of history view? I just don't get it.TCO (talk) 02:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

2. Please rename the sandbox to be something understandable like "Proposed MOS talk page standards" (for the same rationale as section header naming).

3. I can't tell what some of the other comments are and if they are on sandbox 17 (MOS guidelines) or what.

P.s. 2 and 3 are no biggies, but just want to help you, to get good done for the community.


 * ✅. Thanks for the feedback! Student7 (talk) 21:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)