User talk:Studentoftruth1

Welcome!
Hi Studentoftruth1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Ian.thomson (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.
 * We have a tutorial, The Wikipedia Adventure, if you would like to learn more about editing Wikipedia.
 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
 * Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, additions to talk pages should be about improving the article within the guidelines, not voicing one's opinion on the subject matter.
 * Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes ( ~, found next to the 1 key), and please do not change others' comments. New comments go at the bottom, under the comments they are responding to.

Also, articles are rarely written by just one person but as a collaboration between many editors.

If you look at the end of a string of text in an article, you'll find a floating blue number. That number links to the source cited for a statement.

The Prophecy of Seventy Weeks did not use the phrase "critical thinkers" or the word "abysmal" until you added your commentary. Thus your statement Original author calls all previous interpretations "abysmal," and repeats the use of phrases such as "most critical thinkers...," is demonstrably false and suggests that [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc you were just attacking what you imagined the article might say. Looking for reasons to get upset like that isn't healthy or productive]. Whether or not that was your intention, please actually read articles before commenting on them (and comment on their talk page, not the article itself). Ian.thomson (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)