User talk:Studentssecondumass

January 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to University of Massachusetts Amherst. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Hey, I am also an RA at the school, so I know where you're coming from in terms of not enjoying the administration's decisions. That being said, myself and other editors are constantly striving to improve the school's page, so a lot of what was placed there is very pointy and is quite controversial. Yes, I do not agree with what is being done by the administration, and I participated in the rally that we had at the SGA meeting, but please do not add unsourced allegations as well as things that may be viewed as blatent attacks on people who are really just doing their job. I am more than welcome to talk about how to improve the section, but I am even iffy about leaving what's currently there, there.'' Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Point of view on UMass page
Hello. I see you've been adding the "Current Controversies on Campus" section onto the UMass page. Please join in the discussion on the talk page and explain why your content isn't a violation of the NPOV guidelines. Or, perhaps you can re-write your content to a more neutral tone. Thanks, --MikeUMA (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeUMA (talk • contribs)