User talk:Studies Weekly

July 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Studies Weekly


A tag has been placed on Draft:Studies Weekly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ARandomName123 (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * We wanted to just list our company on Wikipedia because it is a legitimate company. We're not trying to advertise, just put objective info there. That is why I chose outside sources as citing, because we are not trying to draw them to our website.
 * If creating a company listing is against the rules, that is totally understandable, and you can delete our post.
 * And I looked at the info about the username issue, but wanted to be completely transparent in our posting (meaning I didn't want someone in our company just to create a user to 'hide' the connection). That is why I signed on as our company name. But again, if that's just completely against the rules, you can delete our post.
 * We were not trying to create an advertising space, just trying to add objective info about our company. Studies Weekly (talk) 22:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this info, and for clarifying this for us. Studies Weekly (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)