User talk:Stupid2

Adoption
Hello, I noticed you wanted to be adopted. I am willing to adopt you. Just leave a message at my talk page. Happy editing! -- Hdt 83     Chat 06:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey there, I have adopted you. Now if you have nay problems or just want to talk, I am always available. -- Hdt 83     Chat 18:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Userbox: I see that you wanted to create userboxes. You can get a general overview here: WP:USERBOX and go on from there. -- Hdt 83     Chat 18:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Username concern
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. NHRHS2010 talk  00:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Another RfA Spaming
 Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA which did not pass at (18/27/10). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait until someone nominates me next time. Thank you for you comments! Tiptoety 00:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit Counter
You can check the basic edit count under the "My Preferences" link at the top of the page. -- Hdt 83     Chat 00:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

OhanaUnited's RfA
 Thanks for voting at my RfA. Unfortunately, the result stands at 51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in featured portals during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in featured portal candidates to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in Good articles. Have a great day. OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to the vandalism4 warning template
Hello. Thank you for your BOLD! changes to the uw-vandalism4 warning template. Your good faith changes have been reverted, and the template returned to its prior state. If you would like to see this -or any of the warning templates- changed, please build consensus on the talk page first. Thanks, --Kralizec! (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Whats up?
Hi, thanks for the warm wishes. If you need help just ask. See you later! -- Hdt 83     Chat 08:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks
  

Dear, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).

Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.

Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. &mdash; E  talk 12:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Hyano czespony
Thank you for refactoring your oppose !vote. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for noticing my ability to quickly adapt to the many everchanging Wikipedia policies! I've been on WikiGrowthHormones since October 2007 when I started to actively edit again. I hope you'll support me again when the time comes for my second RfA, which I hope won't happen until maybe May 2008. Thanks again! - Jameson L. Tai  talk ♦ contribs 04:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator
My RfA was successful, and closed with 44 Supports, 6 Opposes, and 1 Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both Rudget  and  bibliomaniac  1  5  for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 01:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi!
Great name! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.7.232 (talk) 06:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Request for Rollback
Hi Stupid2. I've granted your request. Pedro : Chat  09:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Someguy2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Someguy2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <font color="CEBE70">MECU ≈ talk 14:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Someguy1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Someguy1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <font color="CEBE70">MECU ≈ talk 14:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Someguy2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Someguy2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 18:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Someguy1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Someguy1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 18:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Teen girls.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Teen girls.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <b style="color:green;">Polly</b> (<b style="color:red;">Parrot</b>) 18:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Someguy1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Someguy1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 03:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Someguy2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Someguy2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Pardon?
The user warning WikiProject has no authority to "mandate" anything. I'm afraid that the organization of warnings into a separate section is a very poor idea and one I'm sorry to see the WikiProject adopt. There is a very good reason why this format is almost never used by active vandal fighters: I very occasionally see the numbered list format, but this is almost never seen; I have never seen an example of a separate section for warnings. Just doesn't happen.

Finally, please do not template the regulars. I am an admin and have a substantial number of edits. It really isn't appropriate to tell an admin which format admins prefer, especially when all the evidence makes it clear you are wrong. Thanks, Gwernol 01:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks so much for your support in my RfA, which closed successfully this morning. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 19:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Uw-layout
Template:Uw-layout has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Anomie⚔ 03:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)