User talk:Stupidfunmichael

Chuck Grassley
Hello Stupidfunmichael,

Please read Wikipedia's policy on Biographies of living people. It is a policy violation to call Grassley a "Russian asset" in Wikipedia's voice. Do not add that type of content to any Wikipedia article. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 03:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for what.
Why was I blocked. I am here to build an encyclopedia. What did I say that was false. This detail should be known and remembered about this person. I did not speak in opinion, but a deductive fact. Stupidfunmichael (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I watched the same program, but I also read Wikipedia's guidelines. You are obviously here only to call names--Rachel Maddow didn't use that word. And we don't do "deductive facts". Drmies (talk) 03:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I also watched Maddow and disagree 100% with Chuck Grassley off-Wikipedia. But calling him a "Russian asset" in Wikipedia's voice is equivalent to calling him a criminal who has violated espionage laws. That is simply not acceptable, unless Grassley is convicted by a court of law. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

--Stating Grassley is a Russian asset is simply a truth at this time. It is as true as writing that some has a brother when they do. I did not opine whether this was bad or not- that is the job of the reader. It is your personal interpretation being bestowed on my comment and is completely inappropriate. --

--furthermore, I didn't say he was a willing asset or a coordinated asset or some other thing that would imply he is a criminal. Just that he acted in a way beneficial to the Russians. --
 * You clearly do not understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia until you demonstrate that you understand them thoroughly, and commit to following them scrupulously. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

- please explain how I am wrong? I am following the guidelines to the letter.
 * I just looked at your edits again--clever, having different edit summaries to disguise what you were doing. So I'm revoking talk page access, since we have better things to do here. Drmies (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)