User talk:Sturmgewehr88/Archives/Archive 2015

2015
良正月でーびる. 今年ん宜さん御願さびら. (Did I write that right?) Minfremi (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 良い正月でーびる, and you too!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 23:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:River Soar
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:River Soar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your new articles
May I suggest that you tag your new Japan articles with WP Historic sites? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 04:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

IPA for Okinawan
Sturmgewehr88, I grok IPA and was able to speak Japanese mukashi-mukashi. I dunno about Okinawan. Point me at the reliable sources, and I'll be happy to help out, できるだけ. ピーマン aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mobile, Alabama
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mobile, Alabama. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States)
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party (United States). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Oda Mari (talk) 10:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: January 2015
Hi Sturmgewehr88..It's true, I'm deeply sorry for not respond inmediately to your comment, but I had to go to the kitchen!, sorry...I made the best effort to fixed from now all the details that you put in your message..again, thanks a lot and sorry for the inconvenients!!! Aldebaran69 (talk) 03:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israel
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Israel. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Query and suggestion
Hi Sturmgewehr88. It's nice to find another WWII buff. (My stepfather was a gunner in B25s and B26s.) As you know there has been some brouhaha over your username. I'm curious as to how you got the idea that the Panzer variant of the legendary 88 was called the Sturmgewehr 88. The actual name for the gun is the Kampfwagenkanone 88. Do you think you might be willing to change your name to KwK88? Seems like a win-win: you get the correct name for the gun, and it's not a name that would give people the wrong ideas. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * See the discussion, as you're somewhat mistaken. I took the generic word "assault rifle" and combined it with 88, and Sturmgewehr is abbreviated as StG, so that's how I condense my username. Besides, it's the 88 that people are so concerned about, so replacing "assault rifle" with "tank cannon" doesn't exactly make everyone happy.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 03:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi StG88. You made an edit on Jihadi John and, to me, your name really stood out.  In my case, the mismatched combination of a German assault rifle, with a purported connection to Hitler, and numbers that are used to represent Heil Hitler, which now I understand is unintentional in your case, immediately led me to make assumptions about you.  I know, that's not your problem, but ultimately it's you that is affected.  If I'd seen Kampfwagenkanone88/KwK88, or some historic variant of the 88 AA/tank gun, or SturmgewehrXX/StGXX, where XX is any other number (other than 18! :) ), then I wouldn't have thought twice about it.
 * I don't know what the naming format over on the German WP is. I imagine that they're pretty touchy about potential Nazi references, as you've seen, but I'd be surprised if they banned names that represent a real thing with 88 or 18 in them, for example ArmaLite AR-18.  Bromley86 (talk) 07:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!
Thank you!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 21:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israel
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Israel. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Mitsudomoe
Konnichiwa (Hello)! "Mitsudomoe" isn't used for only Ryukyuan. For example, Kobayakawa Clan also uses this crest. The source was "Bungo Takada Shi Shi" (written by Bungotakada city. Sorry it is not now on sale because it's old book...) It is written about History of Kyusyu. Could you read Japanese ? If you can, please read this website.(clan)) It explains about Tōgō Clan. The author of this website also made extracts from "Bungo Takada Shi Shi." Are you active on Japanese Wikipedia? If you so, please visit my user page. (´･ω･ ∩　Goodbye !--正親町三条(talk) 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * こんにちは！ I know Ryukyu isn't the only entity to use 三つ巴, but the website shows correct crest for Tōgō clan. I will readd the correct one to the article!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 23:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:People convicted of murder
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:People convicted of murder. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Columbia Township, Lorain County, Ohio. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Morisco
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Morisco. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Advertised on Facebook
はいさい！

There is an Uchinaaguchi speaking page on Facebook, so I decided, why not advertise the Okinawan Language page along with the sandbox there, and I did. I had specified wikipedians, those who know English, and of course those that have knowledge on Uchinaaguchi. There are over 7300 people on this page so there may be at least one who can help out.

Minfremi (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That's great Minfremi! I just looked at it. Hopefully more people will get involved now. Oh and I also sent you an freind request and joined the group. にふぇーでーびる！  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 21:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive reverts by Sturmgewehr88. Thank you. --Nanshu (talk) 06:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bengali people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bengali people. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Taking part in a discussion that may have started with an IBAN violation?
Hi Sturmgewehr.

I woke up this morning (Showa Day, but I was working until 11 p.m. last night so I slept in) and looked at the page history on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa and, seeing Catflap's name, checked what he posted and went to AN to ask that the section be closed and him warned (but not blocked).

I go back to the talk page and find that not only his close friend and ally, and possible IBAN-violation proxy, but you as well had already posted in the section. I'll withdraw my request for the discussion to be closed if you think it should stay open, and replace it with a specific request that Catflap's be stricken or collapsed. Otherwise, I'll leave as is.

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 02:31, 29 April 2015 (UTC)


 * at this point I don't think it matters either way. That conversation was stopped dead by John Carter (calling it "independent" of the RfC and using it to end the RfC). Had John Carter not done this, I think I might have had a shot at a resonable discussion with Catflap about the state of the lede. But oh well. And I think you may have jumped the gun a little, as he was (from my perspective) just responding to the RfC and not attempting to interact with you. Sure, commenting on that page at all is getting close to the line, but he hasn't crossed it yet.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 03:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hmm...... does he normally monitor RFCs and post in them on occasion? He didn't respond to any other RFCs at the same time. It seems much more likely that he has kept watching either that page in particular, or my edits in general. (Or that he has been engaging the discussion from the start, but I doubt that theory will gain much traction with the wider community...) Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 03:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Kenji draft
Hey Sturmgewehr88, sorry to bother you with this again, but recent developments have made me worried that if I go to all the trouble of completely rewriting the article and radically increasing its coverage of the stuff Icuc2 said I should, when I try to overlay the draft on the article I will immediately be reverted and forced to discuss each individual point for weeks on end as I have up to this point on the relatively tiny matter of whether "Kokuchukai" and "nationalism" should be mentioned in the lead.

Do you also think I should just give up and make "piecemeal" edits? I took your editing my redraft as a blessing on the project, especially in the light of your previous talk page posts, but was I wrong to read it this way? I have reverted my own removal of the Kokuchukai name-drop in the lead of my redraft in the hopes that there are no other problems. Pending discussion of course: your own comments on this issue were unclear so I don't think there is any "consensus" on whether Kokuchukai should be name-checked in the lead one way or the other.

But...

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 13:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Also, on the subject of your previous RFC, I notice that you noticed that one of the two users on the "nationalism should be in the lead" turned around to our side on that issue, thus essentially ending the discussion and making your original RFC question completely void. When I suggested a new RFC or collapsing the previous discussion and changing the RFC question, I was overruled. But now the same user is saying that the nationalism RFC produced a definite consensus on whether or not the Kokuchukai should be mentioned in the lead, which seems really weird to me.

Any thoughts?

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 13:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not a bother at all! I think the draft is going great (would be better if other editors pitched in though). If other editors add to the draft and the article gets reverted after the overlay, then whoever reverted it is going against consensus.


 * As for the RfC, I think it should be closed since it is no longer an issue (I just love how John Carter made such a big deal over it and then turned around and agreed). Everyone finally agreed that nationalism shouldn't be mentioned in the lede, but everyone but you has also agreed (or not opposed) that the Kokuchūkai should be mentioned. Anyway, I'll get more involved with the redraft and we should continue to encourage the others, especially Icuc2, to contribute as well.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 18:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, you have to admit that the discussion has been pretty toxic up to this point, preventing any true rational consensus one way or the other. Your statement above is the first time you have said "Kokuchukai belongs in the lead" without also saying "nationalism doesn't and several users who are trying to push it in are behaving tendentiously", and Nishidani's posts were the same. SilkTork initially said that the Kokuchukai has to be in the lead based on how the body was structured at that time: I highly doubt any random user who comes across the redraft once it's completed would come to the same conclusion. And it's very difficult to consider what Icuc2 has said as being in support of discussing the Kokuchukai in the lead or anywhere else.
 * I'm going to drop it for now (or... I'm going to try to drop it... I don't know if the others will let me, though) and work on finishing the draft, and not touch the Kokuchukai reference in the lead in the draft. Then once the article is better, and once the dust has settled (and hopefully once John Carter is banned from either interacting with me or going anywhere near the Miyazawa Kenji article) we can go back and discuss the Kokuchukai-lead issue again and all be grown-ups about it one way or the other.
 * Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 23:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taj Mahal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Taj Mahal. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Worst wikimistake ever
i was just going back over the March RFC to verify that I had in fact said what I told Icuc2 I had said about the dragon/poet intro, and I found something hilariously ironic.

On the morning of March 12, 2015, I mentioned a user's name on the talk page of an article that user had never edited nor shown any interest in. Two months later it's still biting me in the ass.

Could this be a candidate for WP:AAAARGH?

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 09:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Well that is ironic. Haha peobably wouldn't make it into the village stocks though.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 15:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Photo request? Main entrance to the South Mississippi Correctional Institution
I saw that you were located in southern Mississippi. Do you do photo requests? If so, how far away is South Mississippi Correctional Institution (Leakesville) from Hattiesburg? Are you interested in posting a photo of the main entrance sign/gate? (please do not try to actually enter the property, though!) I took a photo of the main gate to Parchman and I was thinking of something like that. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * well it's a 45 minute drive from Hattiesburg, but I'd be glad to swing by there! Btw, did you just happen to drive past Parchman and snap a picture of it or did you go out of your way to find it?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 13:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks in advance! About Parchman, I was in a car driving by it. Parchman wasn't the main reason for the car's route, but I knew Parchman was going to be along the route. I had my camera ready as the main gate approached. It looks like somebody painted it yellow (previously a lot of the pictures showed the gate as white).
 * Another thing: I wonder if you or your wife know about the hoshuko (part-time Japanese schools) of Jackson, Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, and Memphis (Japanese in Southaven, et. al. would go to the Memphis school). Here is an Ole Miss page about the Oxford Japanese School. Jackson's is listed by the consulate in Nashville but no independent website seems to exist.
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ah ok I understand. About the hoshuko, no I don't know anything about them. Are you wanting a picture of them as well? I can get one of the hoshuko in Jackson, since I go up there at least once a month, but I probably won't go up to Oxford or Memphis anytime soon (I've only gone through North Mississippi once in my life and it was many years ago).  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I also saw that there's a hoshuko in New Orleans, and I could get a picture the next time I'm down there.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Cool! I'm not exactly sure which building the Jackson Hoshuko holds its classes in. Its address is c/o Wesley Biblical Seminary. Anyway, if you are interested in taking more photos in the Jackson area, if it's okay I would like to show a list of photo requests. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * BTW the New Orleans Hoshuko is held at The Waldorf School of New Orleans. It used to be held at Tulane University. Hoshuko typically rent classroom space from universities/schools/churches since they only operate on weekends, and an office somewhere else houses the school administration. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * not a problem!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Alright. Here is a list of ideas for Southern Mississippi and New Orleans:

Mississippi photo request ideas:
 * Hattiesburg

*Hattiesburg Public School District headquarters: 301 Mamie Street, Hattiesburg, MS 39401
 * Hattiesburg High School: 301 Hutchinson Ave. - Hattiesburg, MS 39401
 * If you want to photograph the elementary and middle schools that would be fine too!


 * Jackson area


 * Jackson
 * Mississippi Department of Public Safety - 1900 East Woodrow Wilson Drive Jackson, MS 39216
 * Jackson Public School District headquarters - 662 S. President Street Jackson, MS 39201
 * Mississippi Department of Mental Health - 1101 Robert E. Lee Building 239 N. Lamar Street • Jackson, MS 39201
 * Mississippi Department of Public Safety headquarters - 1900 East Woodrow Wilson Drive Jackson, MS 39216
 * Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce - 121 North Jefferson Street Jackson, MS 39201
 * Mississippi Department of Education 359 North West Street Jackson, MS 39201 (former Central High School)
 * Mississippi Department of Corrections headquarters, 723 N. President Street Jackson, MS 39202 - See Google Street View
 * Mississippi Department of Human Services headquarters, 750 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39202 WhisperToMe ( talk ) 04:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Pearl'''
 * Pearl Public School District headquarters, 3375 Highway 80 East, Pearl, MS 39208
 * Pearl High School - 500 Pirate Cove, Pearl, MS 39208
 * Rankin County (unincorporated area near Pearl)
 * Central Mississippi Correctional Facility: 3794 Mississippi 468, Pearl, MS 39208
 * Hinds County:
 * Oakley Youth Development Center entrance sign, 2375 Oakley Road, Raymond, MS 39154 - See Google map image


 * Biloxi:


 * Mississippi Department of Marine Resources - 1141 Bayview Avenue, Biloxi, MS, USA


 * Columbia area:


 * Columbia Training School entrance, 1730 Highway 44 Columbia, MS


 * Greene County/Leakesville area:
 * South Mississippi Correctional Institution - 22689 Hwy 463 North Leakesville, MS 39451 - See google maps image


 * Woodville
 * Wilkinson County Correctional Center entrance sign (I don't know the visiting address yet!)

Louisiana photo request ideas: WhisperToMe (talk) 16:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * New Orleans Public Schools offices: 121 North Jefferson Street Jackson, MS 39201 (in Algiers)
 * Waldorf School of New Orleans (location of New Orleans Hoshuko)

If you go into southern Alabama (Mobile and Atmore areas) I'll be happy to make a list for those too! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * alrighty, well I can upload the Hattiesburg and Columbia pictures tomorrow, and maybe I'll get the Jackson area pictures either this weekend or in about three weeks. New Orleans might be in July (I'll be in Fort Knox for the entire month of June). As for South Alabama, I won't be going through there again until early August. Cheers!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 16:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you :D WhisperToMe (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Just got the Hattiesburg pictures, I'll go through Columbia later today and upload them when I get home. Also, I don't know where any of the middle or elementary schools are around here, so I just got HBHS.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! I will get the addresses for Hattiesburg schools from the official website. * Burger Middle School - 174 Wsf Tatum Dr, Hattiesburg, MS 39401 * Grace Christian Elementary - 2207 West Seventh St. Hattiesburg, MS 39401 WhisperToMe (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Harper-Wallin Family Education Center - 516 Forrest Street, across from Hawkins
 * Mary Bethune Alternative Center - 610 Dumas Avenue, Hattiesburg, MS 39401
 * Woodley Elementary - 2006 O'Ferrall Street - Hattiesburg, MS 39401
 * Rowan Elementary School - 500 Martin Luther King Drive - Hattiesburg, MS 39401
 * Thames Elementary School - 2900 Jamestown Road - Hattiesburg, MS 39402
 * Hawkins Elementary School - 526 Forrest Street - Hattiesburg, MS 3940
 * Lillie Burney Elementary School - 901 Ida Ave. Hattiesburg, MS 39401

I'm not sure if there is already a photo of the Hattiesburg city hall. If not, it is at 200 Forrest St.Hattiesburg, MS 39401

And if you have time for more in Columbia (if you don't have time or want to do these on a different day, it's okay!): * Columbia School District (Mississippi) HQ: 613 Bryan Avenue, Columbia, MS 39429 WhisperToMe (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Columbia High School (Mississippi): 1009 Broad Street Columbia, MS 39429
 * Jefferson Middle School: 611 Owens Street Columbia, MS 39429
 * Columbia Elementary School: 401 Mary Street Columbia, MS 39429
 * Columbia Primary School: 913 West Avenue Columbia, MS 39429
 * sorry for the late response! I took an APFT this morning and felt too tired to drive to Columbia, then passed out and only just woke up, but I got pictures of city hall and all of the schools (except for Thames because of construction). I'll upload them after I post this, and tomorrow I'll get the Columbia pictures and one of Thames!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 01:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * My contribs at Commons.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 02:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Because of this more people will you about what the important institutions in Hattiesburg and other cities! WhisperToMe (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't know if you already took photos of Hattiesburg libraries. If not... * The Hattiesburg Library - 329 HARDY STREET Hattiesburg Mississippi 39401
 * The Petal Library - 714 SOUTH MAIN STREET Petal Mississippi 39465

Also:

In Hattiesburg:
 * Presbyterian Christian School Elementary School: 103 WSF Tatum Drive

In Petal: WhisperToMe (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Petal city hall: 119 W. Eighth Ave. Petal MS, 39465
 * Petal post office: 121 Morris St, Petal, MS
 * Petal School District HQ: 617 South Main Street Petal, MS 394965
 * Petal High School: 1145 Highway 42 East Petal, MS 39465
 * Petal Primary School: 60 Herrington Rd. Petal, MS 39465
 * Petal Elementary School: Petal Elementary School 1179 Hwy 42 Petal, MS 39465
 * Petal Upper Elementary School: 400 Hillcrest Loop Petal, MS 39465
 * Petal Middle School: 203 E Central Ave Petal, Mississippi 39465
 * I just realized I might be a little busy today and tomorrow with personal business that needs taking care of (It'll take me all day and I prefer to get daytime pictures). Friday I'll finish off Hattiesburg/Petal/Columbia and Saturday I'll hit Leaksville and maybe Biloxi (you can add Gulfport photo requests too).  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 17:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's fine! I know it's a large number of requests, so please take your time :) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

If you want more Leakesville pics: ** Greene County High School: 4336 High School Road Leakesville, MS 39451-9801 ** McLain Attendance Center: 300 Shows St/198 Bypass Mclain, MS 39456 WhisperToMe (talk) 21:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Greene County School District (Mississippi)
 * District HQ: 528 West Oak Street, Leakesville, MS 39451-2998
 * Alternative learning center: 400 Hardy Avenue Leakesville, MS 39451
 * Vo-Tech High School: 173 Vo-tech Road Leakesville, MS 39451-9512
 * Leakesville Junior High School: 620 Main Street Leakesville, MS 39451-1479
 * Leakesville Elementary School: 175 Annex Road Leakesville, MS 39451-1299
 * Sand Hill Attendance Center: 39455 Hwy 63 N Richton, MS 39476
 * well I went through Columbia and Leaksville today and got most of the pictures. Some of those addresses were wrong though (CSD office was a bench in the middle of a park?), and I honestly could not find the correctional facility. I found a trailer park full of Greene County police cruisers and some "State property: keep out" signs, but there wasn't much else to indicate that it was there. Also, there was a death in my extended family, so I'll be in Florida until next week.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 03:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to hear that it happened. I hope your family will recover. I'll have to double-check the CSD address.
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

This webpage shows an image of the CSD headquarters and gives the address: "613 Bryan Avenue, Columbia, MS 39429" - I know some addresses may be hard to find or conflict with mapping programs. It's unfortunate.... WhisperToMe (talk) 06:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * yeah, 613 Bryan is in the middle of a park, but on the corner of Bryan and Broad was File:Columbia School District Office Annex.jpg (close enough). Very unfortunate.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 06:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * One trick for next time is using alternate mapping software that may pinpoint the location better. Another is to search in Google Maps street view until you see the real building. In the country I'm in right now I can't use Google Maps easily... - Also, do you often visit the place in Florida in happier times? If so I can post requests for that area too. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Well like with the correctional facility, I used two different mapping softwares (considered going to the courthouse and asking for a real map) to find where it was supposed to be, but I just couldn't find a way in. And no, I only come out to Florida about twice a year at most. What country are you in?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 13:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Currently I'm in Mainland China WhisperToMe (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Another good photo op for the Jackson area: Piney Woods Country Life School (Rankin County) WhisperToMe (talk) 22:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

you've got mail
check ur inbox sturmgewehr

Photo request
Hi Sturmgewehr88, I came across several photos on Wikipedia that you have recently taken in and around Hattiesburg, MS. That led me to your Talk page, where WhisperToMe had made several photo requests. If you are still amenable to photo requests, there are two buildings located at Camp Shelby that are on the National Register of Historic Places, but lack photos. Those structures are items #2 (Building 1071) and #3 (Building 6981) on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Forrest County, Mississippi. Images of those two buildings would complete the current NRHP listings in Forrest County. Thanks for your consideration. Woodlot (talk) 11:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm in Florida for the week, but when I get back I can easily get the pictures.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 13:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Little help?
Believe it or not, Curtis has actually started an ANI thread asking for me to TBANned for supposedly engaging in "battleground" behaviour. Even though said battleground behaviour consists of pointing out the blatantly obvious fact that he has been misreading/misrepresenting sources, something you yourself have pointed out too. The thread is TLDR but several users who don't like me for other reasons have already voiced their support without actually reading the discussion. Little help convincing the community/admin corps that he is the one who needs a TBAN? Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 00:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Italic text

Signature
Hey Sturmgewehr, I noticed that your signature is causing a bit of problems with Wikipedia's syntax highlighting, and I would appreciate if you could fix it as a courtesy to myself and others.

Your current signature:

 ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話)

What it creates:

 ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話)

Fixed version:

 ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話)

What it creates:

 ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話)

Thanks, Pishcal  — ♣ 02:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * please see this discussion. Originally, my signature was how you are asking me to change it to, but another user a few months ago asked me to change it because it interfered with some gadget. I'll go ahead and ping .  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 02:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I actually believe that we've both suggested the same change, and are referring to the same "gadget", the syntax highlighter. Just to clarify, I am asking to to change your signature to the bottom version. I've reformatted my original post just to make it a bit more clear. As you can see and as McGeddon said previously, they both render the same, but the bottom version doesn't cause problems to the syntax highlighter. Pishcal  — ♣ 02:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No, you're asking me to change my signature back to how it had been previously. My current signature is how McGeddon asked me to change it to fix the syntax highlighter. I will change it back now because you're asking me to, but I want to hear from McGeddon.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 02:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 02:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nisour Square massacre
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nisour Square massacre. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Why My Edit Was Not Unnecessary
I can see that you recently reverted my edit on an article. The reason for this you claimed was that my edit was unnecessary. However, I utterly fail to understand why my edit would be unnecessary, all my edit consisted of was adding a metric measurement alongside the measurement in feet. The reason behind my edit is that the majority of the World's population are not brought up with feet as a measurement (including myself), therefore it is much harder to visually what six feet actually means. Therefore, I added the measurement in the metric system. I fail to understand why this is supposedly unnecessary. Yes, the metric measurement is mentioned in the fact box, but so is the measurement in feet, would it not then also be unnecessary to have the measurement in feet in the article? I sincerely hope that you do respond since I am genuinely intrigued to your thought process behind this. --Hejligan (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The source that stated his height used feet, so that's what I used in the article, and I put meters in the infobox for convenience of metric users, so yes I thought it was unnecessary. But I'm inclined to agree with you now, and I'll readd meters to the article.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 16:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! It is pleasurable that we could reach agreement! --Hejligan (talk) 20:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of Slovakia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Slovakia. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Croatia in the union with Hungary
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Croatia in the union with Hungary. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Debate on the monarchy in Canada
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debate on the monarchy in Canada. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Uni-Ufugusuku
Can you put Uni-Ufugusuku in a more specific subcat than "15th-century Asian people"? It's the only article sitting in a vague categorization there. --Slivicon (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 16:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1982 Lebanon War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1982 Lebanon War. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kosovo
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosovo. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Standard GGC Notice
ForbiddenRocky (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

More IBAN violations?
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 182.249.10.206 (talk) 02:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diary of a Japanese Military Brothel Manager. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:India
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:India. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Blocked sockpuppet tags
Hey, can you not leave the sockpuppet templates that suggest the user was blocked? That should be up the blocking admin when they really are blocked...

Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 07:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * sorry about that, I'm just trying to link these socks to their master account and I assumed they'd been blocked. Is there a better template for this, or should I manually add Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of ShantaePirate?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:49, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Who-wass? is the latest sock.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * yep... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 15:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joseon
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseon. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * you invited me to participate in my own RfC FYI..  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 02:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

History of Japan revert
Just so you know, you're assisting in the harassment of Hijiri88 against other editors. He has only placed the tags on the article out of spite to irritate CurtisNaito. Perhaps you are unaware that Hijiri88's actions are being investigated at ANI. — Calvin999 17:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * how is challenging the reliability of a source (which to me isn't reliable) a form of harrassment?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 17:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Because he's cropped up on every article and nomination CurtisNaito works on and nominates since Curtis commented about the course of action that should be applied to him on ANI. — Calvin999  21:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * and that would be History of Japan and that one other article right? Two articles over the course of several days is still not hounding.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 23:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Do you want to take CurtisNaito and TH1980 to ANEW or will I?
I'd really rather you do it, and I back you up, since I think another AN thread started by me is a bad idea at this exact moment.

It seems pretty obvious that CN didn't read my comment before making his latest revert. They have thus far completely failed to use the talk page correctly (as with last time CN was told off on ANEW) and are therefore the only party who have been engaged in "edit-warring". BRD and BURDEN are both on our side as well.

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 11:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I won't be able to do it until this evening, but at this point something needs to be done. You should also stop reverting him so it's not as bad when the finger-pointing starts (and it will). TH1980 is a different story, I'd rather leave him be for now.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 13:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I agree with you. I don't think blocks are warranted anyway -- I think what we should request is that an admin revert to the consensus version generally agreed to by you, me, Nishidani, Vivexdino and Phoenix7777 and protect the page for a coupla days.
 * Although if Rjensen responds to the message I left him the way I think he might, then it will no longer be five users independently opposing the reinsertion of those citations against two users who think they belong and two users who think any position I hold must be wrong, but five or six users independently opposing the reinsertion of those citations against one user who thinks they belong and two users who think any position I hold must be wrong.
 * Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 13:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Although Calvin999 has been here far too long and made far too many good edits to actually be a "true believer" in the cause of forcing me off Wikipedia -- he could probably be won over with the proper well-reasoned, policy-based arguments. I just don't think I'm the one to do it. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 13:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

History of Japan is not a GA, and should probably be reassessed in the near future
Hey, regarding the massive problems already demonstrated on the "good article" History of Japan -- would you mind helping me draft a GA reassessment proposal here? As you know, I have a habit of being kind of long-winded, and not very objective. In talk page discussions I can't reasonably ask you to write my posts for me, but I can ask for assistance drafting a proposal. As you are also aware, the article contains massive sourcing problems, with unreliable sources cited, and words put in the mouths of reliable sources -- I checked some of the areas I know more about than the Wikipedian who rewrote the article, and found about a 75% OR/misleading rate; but I don't know everything -- if you could check some of the other passages for problems and succinctly describe them in the draft, it would help. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 12:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * which sections have you already checked?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 15:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The sentences discussed in the draft, and the ones I edited since... Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 21:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Catflap
Considering how much I've been trying to keep him from retiring, you shouldn't be surprised to have seen it coming. Luckily, one thing I pointed out to him, in e-mail, was that we have a lot of material which is still used in academic reference encyclopedias from older PD German-language encyclopedias, and a lot of it could be very beneficially used if it were translated. I am still, unfortunately, working on the list of works by number of times referred to from the Encyclopedia of Religion, but I hope to have it finished and added to the talk page of the WikiProject Religion/Library page by the end of the week, with any luck. John Carter (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I think you're mistaken; I predicted he would come back out of "retirement", again, which he basically just did. If anything, he's just taking a wikibreak.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 23:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have been in contact with him for some time, I don't think you have. I actually try to keep in regular e-mail for a while with a lot of editors who are considering leaving, as part of the efforts of WikiProject Editor Retention. And, actually, he had indicated earlier that he would be amenable to doing some translations from German-language sources like the RGG for articles we don't have here yet and maybe adding them to German wikisource first, perhaps translating to English wikisource second, and then, maybe, using that as a basis for an English article here. Not everyone place first priority on editing their user page first, and, apparently, he may not have forgotten the edit, or had it slip his mind, earlier. John Carter (talk) 23:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No, not since he stated he no longer wants to interact with me however-many months ago. And good for him and the project if he decides to do that. On another note, you study religion right? Which religions specifically?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 01:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Not so much any religion specifically. My own field, I guess, is primarily reference works. I live in St. Louis, which has a huge number of seminaries and divinities schools in the area, and also the St. Louis University divinity library, counted as being one of the best in the world in the broad field of religion as a whole. Washington University's library isn't so much a divinity library, but it isn't bad either. But the religious content has been for some time among the most contentious, and having reference works available tends to make resolving some of the arguments, particularly regarding those relating to weight, a bit easier. And, between all of them, I think I have access to pretty much every recent reference work in the field, somewhere in town anyway. I know Catholicism best, being one, but most of the content on that topic specifically is already fairly good. John Carter (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sefa-utaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryukyuan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

GA reassessment for History of Japan
History of Japan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 06:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

One week after the moratorium...
Does "No one has yet found any actual problems with the sourcing used in the article" seem like it "violates WP:IDHT"? Because that's how it looks to me. I don't think Dennis Brown would take to kindly to me reporting this violation to him directly, though. Thankfully, you already said you were on the lookout for this -- wanna field this one? Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 18:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * He just did it again. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 18:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll wait for his reply at the GAR, and if he just continues I'll go ahead and let Dennis Brown know.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 18:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * He couldn't resist: two hours after you posted the above, he repeated yet again "There was no problem with the way the original sources were cited, but there was disagreement over certain dates and details and so ultimately the original sources were replaced with different sources". Also, another thing that should probably be pointed out to Curtis in response to "In a reassessment, discussion should focus on alleged problems with the article as it is, not alleged problems which no longer exist" the fact that the article never should have passed GA review in the first place; it only snuck by despite obvious, glaring problems because the reviewer ignored these problems. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 02:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I think you need to do it soon. AlbinoFerret and John Carter (without giving me a notification) followed my edits very closely and almost immediately made a de facto request to Dennis to block me for what may or may not have been a slight slip-up. But I didn't slip-up. There was no assumption of bad-faith, bludgeoning, personal attacks, IDHT, poor sourcing, or any other such from me in the above link. CurtisNaito very quickly violated the final, final warning on engaging in the exact same disruptive, IDHT behaviour as before by insisting three times in a row that no one had found any problems with the sources, with problems with the sources very clearly presented both weeks ago and in the current GAR. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 03:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I replied to your email, by the way. :-) Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 16:55, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Could you post something on the GAR for me?
Would you mind telling TH1980 that I live in Japan and can't access American libraries, and don't want to waste money on importing a short introductory textbook to a subject I took multiple classes on in college? And that his word on what the source says is pretty worthless if he can't distinguish "about 1004" from "in 1004", "after 759" from "in 759", "Chinese poetry" from "Japanese poetry" and "immigration" from "invasion"?

I'd do it myself, but I'm committed to not responding more than twice, and you're a rational person so it's not like I'm putting words in your mouth.

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 02:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 Thalys train attack
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Thalys train attack. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Please give feedback on he unconstructive edit made on page Okinawan martial arts
Dear Sturmgewehr88, You appointed my edit on the page Okinawan martial arts as unconstructive. Could you explain why my edit is unconstructive? I really don't understand. I didn't meant any harm to the page.Gyte75 (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm terribly sorry, I saw the diff and thought you were changing the links so they would go to pages unrelated to the subject. I've undone my revert.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 14:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Gyte75 (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Vegeta
Did you say that I was a vandal? What about my edit constitutes vandalism? You must have me confused with somebody else! MaxamillionSmart (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Please remember that additions to articles must be backed up by reliable sources; discussion threads in forums are not reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 19:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't add that source to begin with.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 19:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * No, but when you reverted MaxamillionSmart, you re-added it. In other words, MS's removal of it was a good-faith improvement of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Shii
Shii haasn't edited since July, as per here. Maybe asking someone more, well, active, might be useful. John Carter (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

I didn't want to cause a controversy --MaxamillionSmart (talk) 23:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * thank you.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 04:36, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Ping
Re: this. You can't jsut correct an attempted ping like that—NihonJoe won't be pinged. You have to re-sign your post if you want it to work. I don't know if that's a bug or if it's the way it's supposed to work. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 04:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ok, I resigned it, thanks for notifying me.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 06:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:African American
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African American. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

This isn't going to turn out well
I'd love to comment on TH1980, but I don't see this turning out well. Certain editors are too adept at gaming the system, and I think you guys leave yourselves wide open to their attacks. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If the ArbCom case ends up encompassing the CurtisNaito disputes, it will end up being Hijiri vs the world. That appears to be the goal of the gamers—make it all about Hijiri. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 00:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Like I just told Kingsindian, from my own limited experience, I don't remember ArbCom ever telling anyone that they could not become a party to a case. CurtisNaito has, apparently, although I acknowledge the dubious phrasing, requested being listed as a party, and it seems likely to me, on the basis of what I said above, that he likely will be allowed to become one. I think I remember, once, maybe, a case being split into two cases, and if anyone thinks that might be a good idea here, hey, go for it and ask it be broken up into multiple cases. John Carter (talk) 00:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * There we go—talking about them as if they were one case that needs to be "broken" into two, instead of two unrelated cases that are now being schmeershed into one. I fully expect someone to get around to naming me an involved party, despite the fact that I have been in dispute with neither Catflap nor CurtisNaito. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 00:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * AGF is just wonderful, isn't it? So far as I can tell, CN has asked to be a party in the C/H case, and, if he is made one, then it will be just one case as a matter of procedural fact, whatever others think of the fairness or lack of same in that. I guess I should also say that I think it worth noting that in a lot of regards the only real difference between a party and a non-party is the amount of evidence they can present. ArbCom has also at least historically stated up front that the behavior of all individuals involved is subject to review, whether they are parties or not. Also, I guess it is worth noting, it isn't simply the amount of evidence that is presented which they take into account, but any indications of behavior behind evidence, etc., etc., etc., which, by large, isn't determined by amount of evidence. Of course, anyone can file evidence, whether they are listed as parties or not. John Carter (talk) 00:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Muddying the waters is muddying the waters, and nothing good will come from it. Certain editors there are invested in gaming the system and will draw other editors' efforts away from improving content. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 01:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Denial of reality, such as perhaps the reality of a given individual being a party, whether others approve of that or not, is also denial of reality, and very, very rarely does anything good come of that. And there are also in general very few good results when individuals apparently believe that their own preconceptions are what qualifies as "good" to their eyes, and also, frankly, their perhaps being unwilling to actively do anything to bring about what they see as good, preferring to simply complain in dubiously relevant ways and locations. John Carter (talk) 01:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ??? We're apparently not even talking about the same thing. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 02:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * allow me to translate: no good will come from StG88's denial that TH1980 is an involved party at ArbCom. Also, little good comes from believing what you think is "good" is actually "good", and also you not not willing to fix problems but preferring to complain about them instead (John Carter has this thing where he'll complain about something and if you tell him he should do something about it, he'll tell you to do something about it, because you are the one complaining). At lease you and I are on the same page CT. I knew the instant that John Carter showed up that he would filibuster the hell out of the thread until the cavalry arrived, and then it'd be closed as "no consensus" as always. If I had known that "he's possibly involved at ArbCom" was a valid excuse to let a wikistalker off the hook and call the opener a proxy/meatpuppet I would've waited even longer to bring up this issue. And you're right, these editors pushing to include CurtisNaito, TH1980, and others into the case are trying to make it "Hijiri vs the world".  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 04:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 4, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz  Read! Talk! 18:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88 update
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 4, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz  Read! Talk! 09:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Just FYI
You've been mentioned by two separate users here. If you wanna weigh in when you get back from your break it might be a good idea. I'm gonna steer clear of it from now on, since I wanna devote all of my non-ArbComEvidence energies to building the encyclopedia for a while (hopefully until the ArbCom case is fully resolved). Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 16:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Holy Hell what else have I missed?  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 05:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of military occupations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of military occupations. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Massive IDHT/misrepresentation of sources on Talk:History of Japan (again)
Hey Sturmgewehr88, sorry to bother you again but I don't have the energy to deal with this right now.

I quoted Henshall right to Curtis's face and he responded with this outrageous interpretation of the text I quoted.

Would you mind talking to him, or maybe getting an admin (since he seems to think that admins, even former admins, are infallible -- at least when they appear to be on his side) to talk to him?

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 15:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Also, notice how it took him only four minutes to read this comment by me and think up and type a 44-word response. It's almost like he had the response pre-written. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 15:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've addressed this at ANI.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 16:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to say this again...
Curtis responded to a point-blank quoting of what the source said and what he said with "I never distorted any wording from the source". However, I doubt he even read my comment before responding, given the break-neck speed with which he managed to do so. To check, I retyped the exact 88 words he did, not bothering to fix spelling errors I made along the way from typing as fast as I could, and it took me one minute and fifty-six seconds. He managed to not only do that but also read my post carefully and compose his response (rather than just retyping it) in under five minutes? How are we going to work with this guy if he is not only ignoring what we say but apparently doesn't even care to make it look like he's reading our responses to him? Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 01:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration evidence phase closing
Sturmgewehr88, this is just a note that Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence phase will be closing in 2 days. If you would like to add any additional evidence or respond to statements made by others, you have until November 4th. Liz Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 13:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Let's collude some more
We can find an article and work—together, mind you!—to improve it. You know, like we always do, ever since that article—but I think it'd be much more effective if we did it like that other article. Don't tell anyone, though, or we'll get indef banned. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 22:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muammar Gaddafi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muammar Gaddafi. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

I strongly doubt ArbCom will make a judgement on the CurtisNaito problem...
...so once the case is done we'll still have to deal with it. And he just made probably the most offensive of his IDHT/KETTLE comments yet. This is one to keep on file for later. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 22:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Help needed
It seems cried for help before I did. CT has insulted and threatened me several times and cursed like a sailor, all while violating many Wiki rules and being antithetical to the spirit of this site. I have attempted to defend my position with objective sourcing, but CT seems to prefer his own ownership of articles and logical fallacies and accusations over truth. All I tried to do was say that, much like Hakuna matata is clarified as not literally meaning "no worries" in Swahili, it is not "righting great wrongs" to put "ethnic groups" instead of "races" in the Maus article, and I already have three non-cherrypicked objective sources defending me. I have more, and he has nothing but being aggressive. I don't know why he's so stubborn when I have more defending me. Please help.-- <small style="font-size:85%;"> Sığe  &#124;д=)  02:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * As another user pointed out at ANI, I'm not an admin; read WP:CANVASS. I think what another user said, using "races or ethnic groups", would be good wording. And the two sources you used in the article simply use the term "ethnic groups"; they aren't proposing that one is preffered over the other.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 08:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greco-Italian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greco-Italian War. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Catflap08 and Hijiri88 Proposed Decision posted
Hi Sturmgewehr88, in the open Catflap08 and Hijiri88 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee,

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Liberland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Liberland. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

cdo wiki
Hi, Sturmgewehr88. I am campaigning for sysop in cdo wiki. Can you vote for me? Thanks.--El caballero de los Leones (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Atlantis
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Atlantis. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

"threats and intimidation"!?


You offer not to follow him and revert all his bad edits (only the ones on your watchlist) and he responds like that? I've only seen this kind of bizarre overreaction (deliberate misrepresentation?) from CurtisNaito -- perhaps more evidence that they are in cahoots and coordinating off-wiki?

Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 07:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't go that far. I would just sum it up as him being salty.  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 02:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment/Iwane Matsui/1
Curtis keeps decollapsing the extraneous discussion, and he's made it quite clear that his intention is to BLUDGEON the discussion to keep outside input to a minimum in order to decrease the chances of the article either getting radically altered or delisted. I can't handle much more of the IDHT abuse he's been dolling out on me. Any chance you could deal with it? Also pinging User:Curly Turkey: Sorry CT, I know you've been putting up with almost as much of this crap as I have of late, and I know you said you wouldn't get involved; this is mostly just to let you know what's been going on lately. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 10:52, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know what's going on. I've been basically following it. I don't understand how he gets away with it after all this time. I've got little faith that even a book full of dis it's going to convince anyone who doesn't try seriously to engage with CurtisNaito, and who could blame anyone for not wanting to wade through his horseshit? Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 14:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, and I know someone is going to try to paint this as canvassing on my part. It is not. Sturmgewehr88 already knows about the discussion, he is involved in it, his comments are the ones being collapsed, and his name has already been mentioned several times in the discussion on the talk page. He is the only one with as much of a right as me and CurtisNaito to be involved in a discussion of whether his comments should be collapsed and summarized. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 10:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Green children of Woolpit
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Green children of Woolpit. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)