User talk:Stutiikh

Don't edit Raj h saluja - the article has been moved to Raj H Saluja (with capital letters) and that's where you can edit it. Just don't add Wikipedia articles or YouTube videos as references. More info here. Thanks, and happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 21:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Raj H Saluja, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''I've left two explanations as to why Wikipedia articles aren't valid references. Please stop re-adding them.'' —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Download sites are also not valid sources for articles. Again, as I've explained, a Wikipedia article is not to be used as a portal for downloads, a person's portfolio, another website, etc. See WP:References for information on what appropriate references are. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raj H Saluja


The article Raj H Saluja has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Seems to fail WP:N. I'm not finding any significant coverage of either or ; the hits from the latter search are mostly not about him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Aksshat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aksshat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aksshat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lourdes  06:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)