User talk:Stutzvonkroll

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Janoyan.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Alan janoyan.jpg. The copy called Image:Alan janoyan.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

The "sockpuppet" thing means that you were thought to be the same person as the operator of the User:Scibaby account, not that your account was compromised in any way. But I don't see this account name appearing in any of the pages related to the case (at Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby), so I'll ping (the blocking admin) to see if they can recall the evidence behind the block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, Raul654 has been editing very infrequently for several years now, so there may be a long wait for him to respond, and in any case it seems doubtful that he would remember the reason for a block after more than eight years. I can see no evidence of sockpuppetry, but I can see that the editing you did before being blocked was unambiguous vandalism, so I suggest you comment on that. You are unlikely to be unblocked by any administrator who sees the vandalism in your editing history unless you give him or her reason to think that you are unlikely to continue in the same way if you are unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I concur. The sockpuppetry is arguable, or at least not now demonstrable, but the vandalism remains on your edit history. An unblock without some sensible comment on this is unlikely. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)