User talk:Stuwil84

Speedy deletion of Stuart David Graham Wilson
A tag has been placed on Stuart David Graham Wilson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 15:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rupert Dannreuther


The article Rupert Dannreuther has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Top Jim (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rupert Dannreuther


The article Rupert Dannreuther has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability. Contrary to what the article says, there is no evidence that he is "well known". The only references are reports of one minor news event, and there is no evidence of substantial independent coverage, and none at all of coverage of him as an artist, rather than as someone who once appeared briefly in the news in a minor incident.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)