User talk:Styyx/Archives/2022-Q3

Page reviews
I have three glorious pages for you today. Ramón Herrera Bueno, List of international goals scored by Vivian Woodward and England national amateur football team results (1906–1939). Three of my finest works.Clenixon (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
(t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 8259
I fixed the source you mentioned on Draft:Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 8259, is it enough sources for the article to be approved now? Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 22:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yep, it's good now. I would've accepted it but did it before me. :)  ~Styyx Talk ? 10:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
Hello, Styyx

Thank you for creating Thoppampatti.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * What is considered "good form" depends from reviewer to reviewer. ~Styyx Talk ? 10:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It think it used to be mandatory, but recently has been made optional in the NPR steps. So yeah, up to you if you want to do it or not. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Princess Mirror-Belle
Per your request, the article Princess Mirror-Belle has now been deleted and salted. J I P &#124; Talk 20:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks ! Don't pass me back though. >:( ~Styyx Talk ? 15:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm creating a page you recently moved to my draft section.
Hi Styyx!

I saw your notes that you made on my article "Richard Olson (racing driver)" and I have fixed the reference issue and I now have information from more reliable independent sources. So I'm creating the article again.

Thank you for your notes, it really makes me happy that I can learn from mistakes (because I'm quite new here on wiki.) ~Stefannilsson97 Stefannilsson97 (talk) 19:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Turkish Airlines fleet has been accepted
 Turkish Airlines fleet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Turkish_Airlines_fleet help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 18:22, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Review at Fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France
Hi, Styyx,

What does it mean when an article is marked "reviewed"? Is it part of the new pages patrol, and does it indicate some kind of stamp of approval?

In this review you marked "Fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France" as "reviewed". I got the notification, because I had created it as a redirect, but by the time you saw it, it had been turned into an article by another editor. This article should never have been accepted as a mainspace article, being entirely unsourced, and an unattributed translation to boot. (See User talk:King Pius.) I moved it to Draft space (Draft:Fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France). Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It seems Styyx is at the top of the leader board for the current NPP backlog drive and with zero deletion nominations out of almost 800 reviews. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi ! Marking an article as reviewed doesn't mean it's untouchable. The revision I saw did cite sources, but had no inline citations, so it could stay with a No footnotes tag, or be draftified as you've done. Now, in the above leaderboard link, you can see that I have 103 draftifications, which is way more than anyone else, and I'm a bit sick of draftifying. I'm not objecting your draftification, it might have been the correct call for me to do it in the first place.
 * Btw, just like last time, the leaderboard currently doesn't count CSDs made with Twinkle. Considering I do all the tagging with Twinkle rather than page curation, my nominations will be added in the end. Also, I'm not rushing NPP just because of the drive: |page-curation|pc-accept|pc-reject 768 patrols this month, compared to |page-curation|pc-accept|pc-reject 694 last month until the 16th (when there was no backlog drive), which means there is an increase of just 74 more (~5 per day). Cheers. ~Styyx Talk ? 01:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Styyx, thank you for the explanation; I really didn't understand the process. Also, I realize it's tricky when dealing with a translation; doubly so when it isn't marked or acknowledged as one, and it wasn't clear to me that it was a translation from a French article (and I do those myself all the time) until afterward.  Thanks again! Mathglot (talk) 01:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Just had a look at your leaderboard graph and table; very impressive work by you, and everyone. Also, I can see why you're sick of draftifying; carry on! Mathglot (talk) 02:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank for helping to improve the articles I have created
Thank you a lot for reviewing and editing my articles.
 * This actually looks beautiful, thanks a lot! ~Styyx Talk ? 07:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Women's Euro 2022 stats
Hey, you put the statistics page to draft. Would it be approved if I added links to the stats from external sites? Bullflower (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You need to add sources to these stats, which are currently unsourced. Then it can be moved back to the mainspace. I'd recommend waiting until the tournament is over, though. ~Styyx Talk ? 16:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will do that. Should I contact you again once I add the sources? Bullflower (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yep, that's no problem. ~Styyx Talk ? 17:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:CPA Benito Ramírez
CPA Benito Ramírez is on a government map. That means it’s legally recognized so it’s good for a Wikipedia page. On https://www.soycamajuani.gob.cu/es/nuestra-region/region-camajuani/sobre-nosotros you see a green blob in the middle of La Luz and Vega Alta. That is Benito Ramírez so that means it’s good for Wikipedia. So you lease can you put it back into mainspace? CubanoBoi (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Request
Hi sttyx, could you connected my page National Consultation of Organizations from Suriname in the Netherlands to a wikidata item? Vrostky (talk) 23:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi . I've connected it to Wikidata item Q50209411! ~Styyx Talk ? 23:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MPGuy2824. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Manchuru Estate, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Matt Hicks (engineer)
I am not convinced of your decline at all. Can you please consider stating why all references do not meet the criterias (while several of them are very independent, third party notable stuff as they show Red Hat - ABB partnership and Matt's role as vice) instead of blankly saying "Its not notable"? Comrade-yutyo (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * You really want me to do this again, huh? Going with the numbers as seen in the revision I declined.
 * LinkedIn — Acceptable WP:ABOUTSELF usage, but not independent.
 * Mentioned once, the source quotes a few sentences from him. No significant coverage.
 * Only quotes Hicks talking about a Red Hat project. No SIGCOV about Hicks himself.
 * Sinlge quote, no SIGCOV.
 * This is an attributed copy of Ref 14, not a seperate source.
 * Published by Red Hat. Not independent.
 * Press release by Red Hat. Not independent.
 * That same press release, copied by Business Wire, copied again by Yahoo – WP:PRSOURCE.
 * Fully copy-paste of an email sent by the former CEO.
 * "Hicks is the new CEO, he has worked with the company since 2006", the rest is "Hicks said X". I don't see any SIGCOV.
 * "The Enterprisers Project, supported by Red Hat". Not independent.
 * Not sure if you've got the correct link, I can't find anything related to Hicks.
 * Hicks is only quoted saying stuff about Red Hat. No SIGCOV.
 * Sections about Hicks are taken from Ref 7, the rest are quotes.
 * Press release by Red Hat. Not independent.
 * That same press release. There isn't any SIGCOV about Hicks anyway.
 * There is a very tiny paragraphy about what Hicks did before becoming CEO, which still isn't SIGCOV. The rest is the shuffle announcement.
 * Seems like a pretty clear refbomb. This is the only time I'm going to comment on the sources. I'm not going to repeat the same shit again and again and again. Not to mention the amount of peacock terms you've managed to throw in an article of 270 words. This guy is not notable. ~Styyx Talk ? 13:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Styyx I will report you for this shameless backchat of mentioning another wiki that discredits me as an individual and bad words! Comrade-yutyo (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You can do absolutely whatever the hell you want. ~Styyx Talk ? 18:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Comrade-yutyo (talk) 19:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
Hello, Styyx

Thank you for creating Pabitra Devi Mahatara.

User:Usedtobecool, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * "Thank you for creating" the article in the message about "a page you reviewed". Jesus! Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I thought that she was the mayor, not the deputy mayor. I think I got confused by the conflicting first and second sentences. Though I don't think this can be speedied with an A7. Maybe AfD? ~Styyx Talk ? 10:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * G5 looked like a long shot to me, but happy to be wrong. IIRC, the infobox said she's been both mayor and deputy mayor. I wouldn't assume notability for mayors of small or unknown "cities" though. Notability guidelines have been getting stricter in the last few years and excepting a few, GNG is demanded demanded nowadays for everything. NPOL explicitly asks that local politicians should meet GNG. We can still assume mayors of Capital cities, world's most populous and most popular cities, etc. meet GNG but I would ask for proof for the rest. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Ingratis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Fort Constantine, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 01:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't understand why you've received this message, as the page log shows that the review I undid was performed by User:DannyS712 bot III? is that a bot you operate? Ingratis (talk) 01:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The page creator has fixed the problems and the page is reviewed again, but I'm still puzzled by the DannyS712 bot thing. Ingratis (talk) 05:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I think is the more likely candidate to run a bot with such name. :D Anyway, I think I've figured it out. The DAB was under a different name when I reviewed it: Fort Konstantin. It was later moved by the creator to a different name, which was patrolled by the bot. So in conclusion, your message actually somehow ended up at the correct talk.  ~Styyx Talk ? 21:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for clarifying it - I tend to edit when I'm very tired, so am often puzzled by simple things! All best, Ingratis (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It took me a while to figure out too. xD ~Styyx Talk ? 21:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Dalits in Bihar
Hi, thanks for helping in editing Dalits in Bihar. But your recent edits has created an error in reference. Please see cite error in reference 12 and 26. Rectify that error pls.Admantine123 (talk) 03:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I corrected it, thanks for your help.Admantine123 (talk) 03:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It's safe to say that IABot was not supposed to do that. ~Styyx Talk ? 21:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Page reviews
You missed out on Apolinario Rodríguez, Gregorio Sena, Remigio Iza, Enrique Goiri, Eduardo Montejo, Ezequiel Montero, Luís Reñé, Luis Astorquia, 1902 Austria v Hungary football match and‎ 1900 Coupe Van der Straeten Ponthoz. Apperently you really are the only one who reviews pages down here... Barr Theo (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)‎
 * Hi ! I've reviewed the pages. Assuming that you are the same person as, you generally shouldn't switch from account to account unless there is a good reason (which you might have, I don't know ¯\_(ツ)_/¯). It's also better to disclose such accounts. ~Styyx Talk ? 15:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm CollectiveSolidarity. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2028 United Nations Security Council election, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
Why are you moving the article I created to "draft space"? Moonspiel (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Because the article you created cites a single source. The subject might be notable, but the article in its current state doesn't show it. That's why draftifying is a thing: to give you a chance to improve your text instead of being nominated for deletion right away, but it doesn't seem like you're taking it. ~Styyx Talk ? 23:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Robert Eusebio
An administrator deleted the article Robert C. Eusebio. Noobguy33 ( user talk ) 07:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Turkish Airlines fleet
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Your edit on Vaghela clan
Greetings. I noticed that you removed details of mine regarding the Vaghela clan page as you discussed I copied the information elsewhere. The information was from the Vaghela dynasty article. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi . I can't find the sections I removed from your article in Vaghela dynasty. Though for future reference, you have to use a descriptive edit summary about copying, see Copying within Wikipedia. ~Styyx Talk ? 09:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Archiving Sources
Can you use the bot, you use to archive sources in one go, at following articles: Chandradeo Prasad Verma Jagdeo Prasad Satish Prasad Singh- Thanks-Admantine123 (talk) 12:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, ! You can also use the bot yourself via its website, or alternatively go to the page history of the article you want to archive the sources of and click the "Fix dead links" button listed at the external tools. Make sure to tick the "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)" box on both methods! ~Styyx Talk ? 12:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks
 * I used the bot here at Luv-Kush equation. I want to know, is it only usable on non dead links? What about url which are dead?-Admantine123 (talk) 22:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, what happened to source 33 here? in Janata Dal (United). Why it's not archived. -Admantine123 (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If the link is dead, but someone made a working archive of it before at webarchive, then the bot add it as well. If the link wasn't saved and there is no available archive, it will add  to mark is as "permanent dead". There is, however, no guarantee that the bot will always work.  ~Styyx Talk ? 22:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deli Mike
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deli Mike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deli Mike
The article Deli Mike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Deli Mike for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deli Mike
The article Deli Mike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deli Mike for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Antonio Dikele
Hello I started an english article about Antonio Dikele Distefano based on exsisting pages in Italian and French supporting the paragraph with articles of New York Times and Indiewire (notable and reliable sources) and this was not consider reliable. I ask to publish the article, please Ewe1971 (talk) 08:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi . Please take significant coverage into consideration as well. Both sources are announcements related to the show he produces, without much focus of Dikele himself. ~Styyx Talk ? 10:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Page reviews
Jaime Villena, Jaime Bellavista, Cristóbal Salvó, Pantaleón Salvó, José Berrondo, Pere Molins, Mario Passani, Mariano Lacort, Genaro de la Riva, Salvador Surroca, Nicasio Goitisolo, Gabriel Bau, José María Muñagorri, Cándido Martínez, Switzerland national football team results (1905–1918), List of Denmark national football team hat-tricks, List of men's Olympic football tournament hat-tricks (the remaining references), France national football team results (unofficial matches),‎ 1901–02 Copa Macaya, 1913 Pyrenees Cup, 1914 Pyrenees Cup and Rogelio Barril. It's actually a crime you missed so many. I could get you fired for this, but as a sign of my generosity and good faith, you get a PASS this time. Now work! (Barr Theo (talk) 02:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi ! I've reviewed the articles. As the notice on top of my user and talk page suggest, I'm off for a short break, which includes reviewing. Seems like I'm not the only one. :D ~Styyx Talk ? 21:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award

 * Better late than never mate! xD ~Styyx Talk ? 21:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Request on 08:06:31, 31 August 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 212.36.208.37
Hello dear reviewers, I have been trying my very sincere best to fix this issue of "reliable source" that is making you reject my "draft". The following message was sent : Sources are at the very end as a general list of references, but not as footnotws. See Wikipedia:Inline citation and Help:Footnotes.

It seems that I am not understanding exactly how to fix the issue and I am thinking that the reviewers are questioning the reliability of the sources I have mentioned. Many someone please help me into fixing the issue and not just revoking my submission please?

Many thanks for your comprehension and cooperative help.

Best regards, Mr.Fady Jeanbart

212.36.208.37 (talk) 08:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello! The draft you are working on has a general list of references at the end. This style makes it impractical to find which source supports what statement, making verifiability difficult. Because of this, on Wikipedia, we mostly prefer to have inline citations. With this, you add the source directly after the sentence it's confirming:


 * Which gives:
 * A sentence in the article.
 * A sentence in the article.


 * Just like I said in the declining message, I recommend you to read Inline citation and Help:Footnotes. If you have any other questions, you can let me know here, or if I take too long to respond, at the AfC help desk. ~Styyx Talk ? 09:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xantares has been accepted
 Xantares, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Xantares help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 23:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Turkish Airlines Flight 301
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

your opinion
Hi, as you're Turkish user, can you please tell me your opinion about this reference is it ok to use? ZEP55 (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hürriyet is most of the times a reliable source, so ok to use. However, the source consists mostly of a quote of the guy, so I don't think it counts towards notability, but good to use, yeah. ~Styyx Talk ? 12:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vecihi Hürkuş
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vecihi Hürkuş you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gazozlu -- Gazozlu (talk) 17:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Vecihi K-VI
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 06:50, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Geliyoo
The article Geliyoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geliyoo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caleb Stanford -- Caleb Stanford (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Page archives and reviews
Hello. I hope you enjoyed your Wikibreak. I have noticed it ended. So...

All of the following pages have been reviewed, but they didn’t “archived" the references like you do: Pedro Serra (footballer), Estebán Pelaó, Juan Pellicer, Manuel Cros, Juan Olivella, Antonio Alcázar, José Giralt, Alfonso Albéniz, Mario Giralt, José Giralt, José Berdié, José Carruana, José Irízar, Antonio Morales, Velódromo de la Bonanova, William Dyer (footballer), Willie Gold, David Mauchan, George Meyer (footballer), George Girvan, Stanley Charles Harris, Vicente Reig, John Hamilton (Barcelona footballer). When you feel like it could you "archive" the references of these pages, please?

By the way, these pages haven’t even been reviewed: Alfonso Olaso, Enrique Normand,‎ Escocès FC, Francisco Vinyals, Joseph Black (footballer), Plácido Álvarez-Buylla, James Reeves (footballer), Jaime Vila, English Colony of Barcelona Football Team, 1894 Bilbao students v British workers football match.

Thank you very much. Guess you were right. There are more people reviewing my pages now.Clenixon (talk) 00:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The bot that made those archives was down for a few days, but now it's back. I'll look at them when I'm on my computer. ~Styyx Talk ? 07:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bayraktar (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bayraktar (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gazozlu -- Gazozlu (talk) 20:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bayraktar (song)
The article Bayraktar (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bayraktar (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gazozlu -- Gazozlu (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Turkish Airlines Flight 301
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Turkish Airlines Flight 301 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dora the Axe-plorer -- Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 06:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Turkish Airlines Flight 301
The article Turkish Airlines Flight 301 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Turkish Airlines Flight 301 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dora the Axe-plorer -- Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello friend
Hello friend! Thank you for doing this. Could you please explain it to me how to do archiving and saving websites from getting link rot? --Haoreima (talk) 11:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi ! It's done via IABot. If you click on the link you will have to type the article name. You can also go to the article history and click the "Fix dead links" found at the external links section. In both cases, you have to tick the "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)" box before proceeding. It'll take 20 to 90 seconds, depending on the amount of references, and then the edit will be automatically saved. ~Styyx Talk ? 13:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 1972 Turkish Airlines Adana crash
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 02:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)