User talk:Subhayu0101

Welcome to Wikipedia

 * }

Proposed deletion of Arun Nathani


The article Arun Nathani has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not seem notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 21:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jagat Pal Singh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jagat Pal Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jagat Pal Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 05:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Deepak Nathani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Nathani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deepak Nathani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jagat Pal Singh. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jagat Pal Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shrikanthv. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Shrikanthv (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Shrikanthv. It seems that you have deliberately started deleting articles from Wiki. I dont think contents in the same articles are promotional, as it provides all citation and useful links to back it up. Links from Times of India are there to prove the details we have inserted. It will be good if you don't take things purposely and start deleting them.

We have found some similar issues regarding this before.


 * Thank you for pointing me into right direction, please note that it is just a discussion to deletion read the notification, I cannot delete as I do not have any rights!, I wonder your deep knowledge about researching history of accounts that you are some kind of sock ? Shrikanthv (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Jagat Pal Singh. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 13:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Arun Nathani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arun Nathani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arun Nathani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 03:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Taru Mateti for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taru Mateti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Taru Mateti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roller26 (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Cybage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cybage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cybage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 11:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)