User talk:Subtopic256

Deletion
The Vagsbygd High School delete. --188.32.110.144 (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kolsåsen


The article Kolsåsen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * It's not clear that this neighbourhood exists: the reference doesn't give a result, and a Google search doesn't show much.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 18:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kronprinsens gate


The article Kronprinsens gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * It's not clear that this street exists: the references don't mention it, and a Google search doesn't show much.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 07:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Subtopic256. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! NeemNarduni2 (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Holbergs gate


The article Holbergs gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rådhusgata


The article Rådhusgata has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gyldeløves gate


The article Gyldeløves gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skippergata


The article Skippergata has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elvegata


The article Elvegata has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kristian IVs gate


The article Kristian IVs gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent articles
Hello, and thanks for your work on the geography of Kristiansand. However, you've been creating a lot of short articles about roads, each with two references that don't mention the subject, and with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD. May I ask you to please slow down, and spend some time improving one article at a time? Please ask at my talk page if you'd like any help with this. Thanks, NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Odins gate


The article Odins gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fritz Jensens gate


The article Fritz Jensens gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Østre Strandgate


The article Østre Strandgate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vollgata


The article Vollgata has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fjellgata


The article Fjellgata has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gyldenløves gate


The article Gyldenløves gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stener Heyerdahls gate


The article Stener Heyerdahls gate has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Odins gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odins gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Odins gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Østre Strandgate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Østre Strandgate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Østre Strandgate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Elvegata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elvegata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elvegata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  17:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Skippergata
Hello! You cannot just wipe the entry clean of all warnings... Do better than that!!Super48paul (talk)

Nomination of Vollgata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vollgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vollgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  17:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Rådhusgata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rådhusgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rådhusgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tordenskjolds gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tordenskjolds gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tordenskjolds gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kronprinsens gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kronprinsens gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kronprinsens gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kongens gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kongens gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kongens gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kristian IVs gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristian IVs gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kristian IVs gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Gyldenløves gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gyldenløves gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gyldenløves gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Fritz Jensens gate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fritz Jensens gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fritz Jensens gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 17:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Fjellgata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fjellgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fjellgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 17:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
<font color="White">NordicDragon Talkpage 08:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grim (Kristiansand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravnedalen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)