User talk:Subwave

Regarding edits to Kiddo
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Subwave! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 17:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Pages with no content except external links
A tag has been placed on The Armed Gang, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

The same tag has also been placed on Captain Sky, Edwin Birdsong, The ADC Band‎ and Active Force for the same reason. BencherliteTalk 21:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. BencherliteTalk 21:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kwick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste 23:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stomp!
A tag has been placed on Stomp!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ViperSnake151 11:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Complaint about the Kiddo-page and other artists-pages in which i've putted much effort
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddo

Hello Wiki-staff,

There simply is NOT MUCH official reference-material about the funkgroup Kiddo online ... check for instance at allmusic.com ...NOTHING to be found over there about this group. You want a reliable source to be referred to ?! ... the MySpace-site is one of them, but if sources like those are going to be ignored on this site , then i'm done adding valuable info to this page because i've put a LOT of energy in order to get a lot of other "legitimate" and referring wikipedia-links to that Kiddo-page.

I'm tired of the nitpicking about the info which i posted on the particular page and other pages as well, because it feels like after having done much fieldwork to get valuable info on this site , i get a thanks for nothing in return , and this frustrates me a LOT. Some info posted on this site can't even be found on a site like allmusic.com, and i get the feeling there might be missing here on this page the realisation that there's exclusive info added to artists-pages , which can't be found anywhere else. If someone here still feels that the Kiddo-article or other rejected-articles are lacking, then please try to find the artists themselves ( many have their own sites or are on MySpace , but not all of them ! ) about any furthermore info which can possibly be added here in Wiki , and i wish you good luck with that.

I know this is a rant, but i'm expressing my frustration because i also have put a lot of effort in other wiki-pages as well , like the ones from Cameo ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameo_%28band%29  ) , or Louis Johnson ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Johnson_%28bassist%29 ) , which both refer to a lot of back-info from linernotes of records and cd's, vintage magazine-articles/reviews , or given details from the artists themselves in radio-interviews , from which some simply CAN NOT always be found that easy online, but still that particular Cameo-page and Louis Johnson-page are both marked as "not reliable" , so i'm also done with adding anymore info to those pages , even though there's some recent interesting info about those artists , but what's the use of adding them if they're gonna be ignored , refused or rejected anyway ? Especially on internet-media like MySpace can be found the latest info about many artists, so why not embrace that valuable info , instead of staying kinda out of touch sometimes on a desert island ? There's indeed a lot of spam on MySpace as well, but i noticed that the staff here already figured out a sort of firewall to keep them out.

Thank you

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)