User talk:Succisa75

Image:Cagesposter.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Cagesposter.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Possibly unfree Image:BobbyTonelli-picture.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BobbyTonelli-picture.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cagesposter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cagesposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sherby.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sherby.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Angr 17:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ethan-blue.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ethan-blue.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 19:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ethan-blue.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ethan-blue.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 19:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ethan-blue.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ethan-blue.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:DanielBoey.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DanielBoey.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DanielBoey1 (Small).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DanielBoey1 (Small).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bobby 10 (Small).jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bobby 10 (Small).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DanielBoey1 (Small).jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DanielBoey1 (Small).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Daniel Boey
Hi. I deleted the page as it was simply a redirect to a user page from the main space. Feel free to recreate it, as long as it's an article not a redirect. If you need any help, just ask! Happy Editing. Pedro : Chat  12:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The article when I deleted it was the following; ''' #REDIRECT User:Succisa75/Daniel Boey

''' - In other words typing in the name of the article redirected to your user sub-page. Redirects from the article space to user space are not really allowed on Wikipedia. Your actual article is still at User:Succisa75/Daniel Boey but I deleted the redirect. Does that help? Pedro : Chat  14:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Deletion of article Daniel Boey
Can you direct me to where the discussion took place? Was it in the talk page of the original article? ... disco spinster   talk  03:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * OK I will move it back, but try to get a few more English-language sources. One of the external link provided comes up with a server error and another one only goes to Motorola website and doesn't mention Daniel Boey.  ...  disco spinster   talk  04:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Additional resources for Daniel Boey
Those are good sources, except Press clippings which gives me a "404 Not Found" error. ... disco spinster   talk  14:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * OK you can remove the tag at the top. ...  disco spinster   talk  15:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Daniel Boey
A tag has been placed on Daniel Boey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kesh (talk) 23:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Boey
It's my understanding that the page, Daniel Boey, has been recreated and deleted on seven separate occasions. The page is currently protected from editing (and creation) by user who are non-administrators. The page unfortunately can't be restored to the mainspace and protected from deletion by another administrator, there is simply no function on Wikipedia - I also doubt that even if there was, it would be very rarely used. I hope this helps. Rudget . 18:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Not really, I don't think it will be re-created again. Rudget . 18:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Please help me with the Daniel Boey Article
Hi. Unfortuately for some, due to the nature of Wikipedia, things like this will happen. My opinion does not have any more weight than anyone else's, so I can't really unprotect the page unilaterally. There is no way at all for me to protect it against other administrators, and I wouldn't want to start a civil war, especially since I am a new admin.

The only thing I can think of, if you really think the article belongs on Wikipedia, is to go to deletion review and argue that there was not enough discussion in the original Article for Deletion debate (Articles for deletion/Daniel Boey) and that there are more and better references since then. ... disco spinster   talk  20:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I had tagged the main Article space version for deletion because it still substantially read as a resumé and not an encyclopedic article. However, I did not realize someone deleted the version you were working on in your User space, which I disagree with. I have said as much in the DRV. By the way, I had to fix the formatting on the DRV. There's a specific template you're supposed to use there, so I put it in for you. -- Kesh (talk) 22:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Succisa75, see my reply to your recent message over at User_talk:EdJohnston. EdJohnston (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bobby Tonelli recent headshot 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bobby Tonelli recent headshot 2008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If you didn't take the picture, how come you own it? Did you buy it from the photographer? Also, yes, I realise Wikipedia's image guidelines can seem very complicated, and a lot of people don't understand them, but that's because our goal of being a 'free' encyclopedia is a complicated one, and, sadly, because copyright law is very complicated anyway. J Milburn (talk) 13:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Succisa75/Daniel Boey
I have nominated two of your subpages for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Succisa75/Daniel Boey. Cunard (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Tonelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BFF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Sherby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sherby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - filelake shoe  &#xF0F6;   14:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sherby


A tag has been placed on Sherby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Theo polisme  00:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=605854084 your edit] to Bobby Tonelli may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * the The Actor's Centre in London, England, as well as several renowned coaches in the US Ivana Chubbuck, Howard Fine, John Holma.

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Tonelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Class 95 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Tonelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)