User talk:Sudarshanazhwan

January 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Agnihotram Ramanuja Tatachariar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Agnihotram Ramanuja Tatachariar was changed by Sudarshanazhwan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876628 on 2024-01-13T09:07:01+00:00

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Nilathingal Thundam Perumal temple, you may be blocked from editing. Heyallkatehere (talk) 10:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Narayana. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I remove what is unnecessary. I do things with enough information backed up. I am uninterested in knowing my deity from outsiders. Sudarshanazhwan (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Perumal (deity). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  10:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I think you are of a different religion. We are not interested in believing what colonial scholars think. If you are that much interested, you are free to add those to your religious matters. Its better to stay back. I am a Vaishnava and I know more than you. Sudarshanazhwan (talk) 12:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * And we aren't interested in what editor thinks. We only care about sources meeting WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Your experience and knowledge on its own, like mine, is of no value in an encyclopedia that isn't religious based. Doug Weller  talk 14:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
another one... Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!  13:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent tendentious editing while ignoring Wikipedia's core principles. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 13:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Sudarshanazhwan (talk) 13:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for blocking me. I wish for your success in blocking people who provide authentic information. Sudarshanazhwan (talk) 13:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Sudarshanazhwan See my comments above. You, like everyone else, have to follow our policies and guidelines. Doug Weller  talk 14:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Are you sure you want that for your unblock request? It clearly and obviously will be declined and doesn't come close to addressing the problems. See WP:GAB. If you wish to make an appropriate unblock request, please remove your current open request. Otherwise, please expect to lose talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You were right. Life's too short , you appear unable to address the reasons for your block. I guess this sums up matters. You wrote, "I think you are of a different religion. We are not interested in believing what colonial scholars think. If you are that much interested, you are free to add those to your religious matters. Its better to stay back. I am a Vaishnava and I know more than you.." Very well. My standard decline to follow.--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Blanking
You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. If you do so for a third time, you will lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 11:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * This includes modifying existing declined unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)