User talk:Suduser85/Archive 2

This page includes all messages that I ((SUDUSER)85) received in the year 2007. To send me a message or to chat with me, please go to my talk

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants January 2007 Newsletter




SpongeBob Portal

 * Excelent idea..I am starting one right now. --AMK152 (Talk • Contributions) 01:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will need help. --AMK152 (Talk • Contributions) 22:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Do robots dream of electric sheep.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Do robots dream of electric sheep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The lost summer.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The lost summer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blackmail Aerial view.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Blackmail Aerial view.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Do robots dream of electric sheep.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Do robots dream of electric sheep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bjork logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bjork logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EM logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:EM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Abba.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Abba.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lordi.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lordi.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kurt Ebelhaeuser.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kurt Ebelhaeuser.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Carlos Ebelhaeuser.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Carlos Ebelhaeuser.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aydo abay.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Aydo abay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mario Matthias.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mario Matthias.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blackmail Erik Weiss.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Blackmail Erik Weiss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants February 2007 Newsletter




Evanescence
You are a very good editor and I hope you join this project. Thnx!!! A r m a n d o .O (talk 05:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Response here.  A r m a n d o .O (talk 18:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Daft Punk infobox
Template:Infobox musical artist states that labels should separated by commas. If I'm missing something, please contact me. Just64helpin 15:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: DP logo
The logo was previously used outside of the infobox. If we're going to use it in the article, it should be used as an illustrative image, not as decoration. Just64helpin 17:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Triceratron
Looking for someone to add to the 'Triceratron' band page, am looking for someone with knowledge of electro hip hop genre. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bweiland (talk • contribs) 11:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants March 2007 Newsletter




RE: Number of copies sold
It just so happens that I'm planning to expand the Homework article today. The information I'll add will include a citation for the 2 million copies sales. The text should be up shortly. Just64helpin 16:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: problem!
The problem is that you left a tag open, which messed up the syntax. It's fixed now. On a related note, I would appreciate it if your contributions were more directly attributable to the sources. The information you added veered a bit from what the references state, so I cleaned it up. Normally I wouldn't comment on this, but you did do similar work when you expanded the "History" section of the Daft Punk article. Please don't take offense. Just64helpin 19:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants April 2007 Newsletter




Michelle Branch picture is cc-nc-nd
We can't use the image - if you look at the source http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephenpoff/465231660/ it clearly indicates no-derivative works, no commercial use. Megapixie 08:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Michelle Branch Wreckers.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Michelle Branch Wreckers.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

csd 3 - original image on flickr link is no commerical use, no derivative work (which this is).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on  explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Megapixie 01:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants May 2007 Newsletter




RE: The Prime Time of Your Life
I believe so. On a related note, I noticed that you categorized Daft Punk's Electroma to Electroma, Daft Punk's. "Daft Punk's" is part of the title. Just64helpin 17:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Blackmail-new.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blackmail-new.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok  ☠  08:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ween 2000 promo Electra Entertainment.jpg
Hello Suduser85, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Ween 2000 promo Electra Entertainment.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Suduser85/Userboxes/User Ween. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Talking-Heads-logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Talking-Heads-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Benetton family.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Benetton family.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Birgitte SB  21:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject SpongeBob SquarePants June 2007 Newsletter




Chester Bennington
Please do not revert back to the previous versions of the article. There is no proof whatsoever to verify its claims and content. See WP:A --  ►ShadowJester07  13:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Aydos.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aydos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Guy_Manuel.jpg
I have tagged Image:Guy_Manuel.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 17:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CK Calvin Klein.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:CK Calvin Klein.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

U2 Wikiproject Invite

 * Regarding your question here, I would say that would definitely be part of the Project, as the main aim of the project is to improve all U2 articles. So please feel free to sign up at the Project Page. If you have any more questions, please direct them to smithcool, who is the founder of the project, or the Project Talk Page. Also, if you know someone who may be interested, please tell them about the project, even more members would be great! Thankyou.

--Joelster 22:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Sorry man, I would help, but I'm sort of falling back on someone else's request for me to help them right now too... I wouldn't want to add another person to help on my list, as I am pretty busy in my real life too right now. Sorry :( Xihix 21:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Homework.gif
I have tagged Image:Homework.gif as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Lyrics
How sure are you? Are you using your ears, or do you have a physical copy of Dookie? I sadly, do not, but by using my ears and many lyric sites, I thought it was "breaking"... Depending on your response, I might revert it since more sources say "breaking". Unless it says lonely in the Dookie book. Xihix 17:49, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Audioslave article
Hello!

I've seen you had done some editing on the Audioslave in the past, so I thought maybe you are interested in helping me out with getting the article to FA status. I have completely rewritten it, added references to everything that can be challenged, added images with fair use rationales, and audio samples as well. It is currently undergoing a peer review here and also a prose review at the Alternative music Wikiproject here. So if you'd like to, you can write your suggestions to any of these pages, or feel free to edit the article yourself. I think all of the problems are grammatical now, and I'm not that good at pointing them out, or correcting them to a brilliant level, as my first language is not English.

Thank you very much in advance. Gocsa 20:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Foe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Foe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SpongeSeason 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SpongeSeason 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SpongeSeason 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SpongeSeason 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SpongeSeason 3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SpongeSeason 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Click five logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Click five logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bhcityseal.png
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bhcityseal.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Blackmail logo 2.png
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Blackmail logo 2.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Audioslave
Well, the star's there now;) Thank you for your congratulations! Gocsa 09:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Sugarrayfloored.jpg
I have tagged Image:Sugarrayfloored.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 04:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CK Calvin Klein.png
Thanks for uploading Image:CK Calvin Klein.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply
Should be page 910, but could be a page or two off, as I manually calculated it. The online page is still there, but the the page numbers that were next to the albums seem to be gone... ✗iℎi✗ (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Good job man! I looked through it, and it looks great.  I feel somewhat honored you use Dookie as a guide to writing Hybrid Theory.  Once it gets peer reviewed, send it in to WP:GAC, then look for someone to copy edit the article (always helps to have someone else to see if you've made mistakes).  After that, well, nominate it in WP:FAC, and good luck!   xihix  (talk) 03:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It usually takes a few days. In my case, the reviews that were given were not much helpful, so I just forgot about it, and it got archived by itself.  I then went off and got a friend of mine to do some copy editing and I nominated it for FAC.   xihix  (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The person who copy edited Dookie for me was Golbez, though I'm not sure if he'll have the time right now. You can try asking him, though.   xihix  (talk) 21:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Hybrid Theory
It's getting there, but I don't think it's at featured article status just yet. I really feel electronica needs to be mentioned as one of the genres, as every single song on the album contains electronica, whereas, for example, not every song contains nu metal (Cure for the Itch, Pushing Me Away, as well as My December and High Voltage on the special edition). I've also read several reviews that mentioned that LP's difference to other nu metal bands was the more prominent electronica. Also, I'm pretty sure Crawling wasn't a Xero song - its original incarnation was a Hybrid Theory demo. Forgotten and Runaway began as Xero songs, however.

The article is certainly a fair bit better than it was, though. SouperAwesome 13:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * "Cure for the Itch" is nothing but electronica though, and "My December" from the special edition may as well have been written by Depeche Mode. Most of the songs shift from almost complete electronica in the verses into "metal" choruses. The only purely nu-metal songs would be "Papercut," "One Step Closer," and "A Place For My Head." SouperAwesome 13:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * But alternative metal doesn't include the electronic elements at all. As I said, "Cure for the Itch" is a purely electronic song, containing no guitar. "My December" contains a couple of very soft acoustic notes in the background of the chorus, and is otherwise also purely electronic. "High Voltage" contains almost no guitar until the end, when it just buzzes. I understand that one song (if "My December" and "High Voltage" are not counted as they are only on the special edition) is not enough to categorise the album, but all of the songs, every single one, contain the same electronica in the verses, and often also through the choruses. SouperAwesome 13:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand, but every song on the album DOES use loops from start through to finish, and the songs I mentioned don't use the metal elements at all. SouperAwesome 14:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I realise that Linkin Park are not an electronica band, and that Hybrid Theory is primarily a nu-metal album, but the huge electronic part of the sound on Hybrid Theory should be listed afterwards. SouperAwesome 14:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The RS review mentiones "a Jones for Depeche Mode." The VH1 reference and the Sputnik review both mention the electronics, too. The Rythm interview reference and Popmatters review mention also, but call it techno. SouperAwesome 14:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)  Just as a side note, do you think we should copy all this discussion to the album's talk page?

Sorry I didn't respond to your copyedit request earlier/in time to do it for the PR, but I'm sure they helped too. I'll try to do a little bit today. Golbez (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In the End.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:In the End.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Remade
Yeah, I kind of agree. It did seem like a bit much... I'm not sure though. Perhaps the songs that are from the Xero days should probably be given a sentence at least. How about that? SouperAwesome 14:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of a sentence in the song section about how two of the tracks from the Xero tape evolved and were eventually used for Hybrid Theory. SouperAwesome 14:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I was harsh. I apologise. Please though, try to be a bit more reasonable. You're reverting every edit I make and saying "no. Please understand :)" to all of my messages. SouperAwesome 15:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Carlos Ebelhaeuser.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carlos Ebelhaeuser.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 16:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply
No problem, it was a fun ce :-)

Anyways, if you need copyedits in the future, please don't hesitate to shoot me a message (but do put in a request at LOCE). It was great working with you on this one.

Regards, Malachirality (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:WLA
<font color="0095B6">(♠ <font color="1C39BB">Taifar <font color="1560BD">ious1 <font color="0095B6">♠) 02:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Sound files
Hi, what browser are you using and do you have an example of a page in which they do not appear correctly? Also, I've noticed you blanked your monobook.js. Does that cause the media boxes to line up correctly? Tra (Talk) 17:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. It might be something to do with your preferences. Please could you give the name of a page where they appear correctly logged out but incorrectly logged in? Tra (Talk) 16:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I was unable to see a difference in the positioning when logged in and out. Please could you give the name of a page where both the text and the play button look wrong when logged in, so that I can look at which template it is and how it's being used. Tra (Talk) 17:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I think what it could be is that they are supposed to look like that. In this edit, the template was changed to add padding to the text directly beneath the play button, which meant that there was a small amount of space above, below, left and right of the text. The small amount of space to the left of the text is the reason why it is slightly off the margin.
 * The reason why it looks different logged in and logged out is because when you're logged out, you see a cached version that is out of date for performance reasons. You would therefore be seeing the old version without the padding. Tra (Talk) 17:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've now fixed the Multi-listen item and Listen so that the text and the play buttons line up. You might not see the results immediately, so try purging the pages to make the new padding settings appear. If they still don't appear, it might be that they are using a different template to the ones you showed me. Tra (Talk) 00:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Guitar-hero-logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Guitar-hero-logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Will look
I will look at the article tomorrow. Good luck with it! xihix (talk) 06:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CK Calvin Klein.png
Thanks for uploading Image:CK Calvin Klein.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

FAC
Sorry about that..i meant that the lead didnt sufficiently address the nature of the music of the album; wasnt it a revolutionary rap rock/nu metal album, with presence of 2 different vocalists (one rapper, the other a rock vocalist) etc..

Anyway, the main (maybe only) reason for my strong oppose is that you have used non-reputable sources and fan sites to cite a lot of the info, like: songfacts, fofeit the game, LP association etc... Indopug (talk) 12:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Fine, no problem Indopug (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


 * An error according to the Manual of Style - hybrid theory and rock sound (in accolades section) need to be in italics... thats all. also, what is the basis of the order of the accolades table? i think chronological would be better. also remove the overlinking to US and UK in that table Indopug (talk) 14:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Can you please clarify this remark? Are you asking that the FAC be withdrawn? Sandy Georgia (Talk) 00:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)